16.1.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 14/41 |
Action brought on 31 October 2016 — ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe v ECHA
(Case T-762/16)
(2017/C 014/50)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicants: ArcelorMittal Belval & Differdange SA (Esch-sur-Alzette, Luxembourg) and ThyssenKrupp Steel Europe AG (Duisburg, Germany) (represented by: H. Scheidmann and M. Kottmann, lawyers)
Defendant: European Chemicals Agency (ECHA)
Form of order sought
The applicants claim that the Court should:
— |
annul the ECHA’s decision of 26 September 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016); |
— |
alternatively, annul the ECHA's decision of 19 August 2016 (reference ATD/52/2016) to the extent that it rejects the applicants’ request for access to their file; |
— |
order the ECHA to bear the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 4(2), first indent, of Regulation (EC) No 1049/2001
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of Article 41(2), second indent, of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union
|