1.8.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 279/30 |
Action brought on 10 May 2016 — GP Joule PV v EUIPO — Green Power Technologies (GPTech)
(Case T-235/16)
(2016/C 279/44)
Language in which the application was lodged: English
Parties
Applicant: GP Joule PV GmbH & Co. KG (Reußenköge, Germany) (represented by: F. Döring, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Green Power Technologies, SL (Bollullos de la Mitación, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal
Trade mark at issue: EU figurative mark containing the word elements ‘GPTech’ — Application for registration No 12 593 869
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 9 February 2016 in Case R 848/2015-2
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
alter the contested decision and reject the applicant’s trademark application No 12 593 869; |
— |
as a conditional application, annul the contested decision. |
Pleas in law
— |
Infringement of the Regulation No 207/2009 as the information requirements stated by Rule 17(4) of Regulation No 2868/95 which is dedicated to protect the opponent was not held applicable; |
— |
Infringement of an essential procedural requirement as the procedure was unfair to the opponent pursuant to Article 6 of the Convention and Article 47 of the Charter of fundamental rights. |
— |
Failure of the Office to inform the opponent that prerequisites as stated in Rule 20(1) of Regulation No 2868/95 were not fulfilled; |
— |
Wrong application of Rule 76(2) of Regulation No 2868/95, as the procedure was unfair to the opponent in the light of deficiencies of the e-filing opposition form and of the information provided by the opposition division; |
— |
Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009. |