1. 

Appeal — Grounds — Review by the General Court of the assessment of the evidence made by the Civil Service Tribunal — Possible only where the clear sense of the evidence has been distorted — Ground of appeal alleging distortion of the clear sense of the evidence — Need to indicate precisely the evidence alleged to have been distorted and show the errors of appraisal which led to that distortion

(Art. 256 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 58, first para.; Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 195(2))

(see paras 24, 25)

2. 

Appeal — Pleas in law — Mere repetition of the pleas in law and arguments presented before the Civil Service Tribunal — Inadmissibility — Challenge to the interpretation or application of EU law made by that Tribunal — Admissibility

(Statute of the Court of Justice, Annex I, Art. 11(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 195(2))

(see paras 26, 27)

3. 

Plea of illegality — Scope — Measures the illegality of which may be pleaded — General measure providing the basis of the contested decision — Need for a legal connection between the contested measure and the contested general measure — Effect of illegality of a measure of general scope

(Art. 277 TFEU)

(see paras 33, 34)

1.

Sets aside the judgment of the European Union Civil Service Tribunal (Single Judge) of 14 June 2016, Fernández González v Commission (F‑121/15, EU:F:2016:128);

2.

Refers the case to a Chamber of the General Court other than that which has ruled on the present appeal;

3.

Reserves the costs.