8.5.2017 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 144/34 |
Judgment of the General Court of 24 March 2017 — Estonia v Commission
(Case T-117/15) (1)
((Actions for annulment - Agriculture - Common organisation of the markets - Measures to be adopted in consequence of the accession of new Member States - Amounts to be charged for quantities of surplus sugar not eliminated - Request for modification of a final decision of the Commission - Refusal of the request - Act not open to challenge - Confirmatory measure - No new substantive particulars - Inadmissibility))
(2017/C 144/44)
Language of the case: Estonian
Parties
Applicant: Republic of Estonia (represented by: K. Kraavi-Käerdi, acting as Agent)
Defendant: European Commission (represented initially by L. Naaber-Kivisoo and M.P. Ondrůšek, acting as Agents, then by P. Ondrůšek, assisted by M. Kärson, lawyer)
Intervener in support of the applicant: Republic of Latvia (represented by I. Kalniņš and D. Pelše, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action under Article 263 TFEU for annulment of the decision allegedly contained in the European Commission’s letter of 22 December 2014 declining to amend European Commission Decision 2006/776/EC of 13 November 2006 on the amounts to be charged for the quantities of surplus sugar not eliminated (OJ 2006 L 314, p. 35).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action as inadmissible. |
2. |
Orders the Republic of Estonia to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by the European Commission. |
3. |
Orders the Republic of Latvia to bear its own costs. |