Order of the Court (Sixth Chamber) of 4 May 2016 —
Pannonhalmi Főapátság v Parliament
(Case C‑607/15 P)
‛Appeal — Article 181 of the Rules of Procedure of the Court — Actions for annulment — Petition made to the European Parliament — Ownership of a castle in Rusovce (Slovak Republic) — Questions not falling within the scope of activity of the European Union — Decision to take no further action regarding the petition — Statement of reasons’
|
1. |
Acts of the institutions — Statement of reasons — Obligation — Scope — Decision by Committee on Petitions of the Parliament to take no further action — Whether a summary statement of reasons is sufficient (Arts 227 TFEU and 296 TFEU; Internal Rules of the European Parliament, Art. 201(8)) (see paras 13-15) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Decision taken by way of reasoned order — Possibility of ruling without an oral procedure — Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law (Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 126) (see paras 18-22) |
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Magyar Bencés Kongregáció Pannonhalmi Főapátság is ordered to pay its own costs. |