Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 —

Andre (Case C‑23/15)

‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the factual and legal background of the case in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility’

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Reference giving no details of the relevant facts or legislation and not setting out the reasons for making that reference to the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(a)) (see paras 4-9)

Operative part:

The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium), by decision of 24 November 2008 in Case C‑23/15 is manifestly inadmissible.

Order of the Court (Fourth Chamber) of 19 March 2015 —

Andre (Case C‑23/15)

‛Reference for a preliminary ruling — No description of the factual and legal background of the case in the main proceedings — Manifest inadmissibility’

Questions referred for a preliminary ruling — Admissibility — Reference giving no details of the relevant facts or legislation and not setting out the reasons for making that reference to the Court of Justice — Manifest inadmissibility (Art. 267 TFEU; Statute of the Court of Justice, Art. 23; Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Arts 53(2) and 94(a)) (see paras 4-9)

Operative part:

The request for a preliminary ruling from the tribunal de première instance de Namur (Belgium), by decision of 24 November 2008 in Case C‑23/15 is manifestly inadmissible.