|
4.4.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 118/2 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt (Germany) lodged on 7 December 2015 — Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir v Kreis Bergstraße
(Case C-652/15)
(2016/C 118/03)
Language of the case: German
Referring court
Verwaltungsgericht Darmstadt
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Furkan Tedemir, legally represented by his parents Derya Tekdemir and Nedim Tekdemir
Defendant: Kreis Bergstraße
Questions referred
|
1. |
Does the aim of efficient management of migration flows constitute an overriding reason in the public interest capable of denying exemption for a Turkish national born in federal territory from the requirement for a residence permit which he could claim by virtue of the standstill clause of Article 13 of Decision No 1/80 of the EEC/Turkey Association Council of 19 September 1980 on the Development of the Association? |
|
2. |
If the Court of Justice of the European Union answers the above question in the affirmative: What are the qualitative requirements for the existence of an ‘overriding reason in the public interest’ in relation to the aim of efficient management of migration flows? |