2.2.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 34/42 |
Action brought on 4 December 2014 — Hassan v Council
(Case T-790/14)
(2015/C 034/50)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Samir Hassan (Damascus, Syria) (represented by: L. Pettiti, lawyer)
Defendant: Council of the European Union
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
— |
annul, on the basis of Article 263 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (TFEU):
|
— |
declare that the effects of the effects of the acts annulled will be definitive; |
— |
Compensate Mr Hassan, on the basis of Articles 268 and 340 TFEU, for the loss caused to him by the adoption against him of the restrictive measures referred to above, as follows:
|
— |
In any event, order the Council of the European Union to pay all the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.
1. |
First plea in law, alleging a manifest error by the Council in its assessment of the facts and an error in law resulting therefrom, since the Council included the applicant’s name on the list of persons and entities to which restrictive measures apply on the basis of grounds which are not substantiated to the requisite legal standard. |
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging infringement of the right to property and the principle of proportionality. |
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging infringement of the presumption of the applicant’s innocence. |
4. |
Fourth plea in law concerning the compensation for the damage that the applicant suffered as a result of the unlawful measures taken against him by the Council. |