1.9.2014 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 292/19 |
Request for a preliminary ruling from the Helsingin hovioikeus (Finland) lodged on 30 June 2014 — Nike European Operations Netherlands BV v Sportland Oy, in liquidation
(Case C-310/14)
2014/C 292/24
Language of the case: Finnish
Referring court
Helsingin hovioikeus
Parties to the main proceedings
Applicant: Nike European Operations Netherlands BV
Defendant: Sportland Oy, in liquidation
Questions referred
1. |
Is Article 13 of the Insolvency Regulation (1) to be interpreted to the effect that ‘the act in the relevant case’ means that the act is not capable of being challenged after taking account of all the circumstances of the case? |
2. |
If the answer to question 1 is affirmative and if the party affected by the application to challenge the act has relied on a provision of the law within the meaning of the first indent of Article 13, according to which the payment of a due debt may be challenged only in the circumstances provided for therein, which are not mentioned in the action based on the law of the State in which the insolvency proceedings are taking place,
|
3. |
Regardless of the answer to question 2(i), is Article 13 to be interpreted as meaning that
|
4. |
Is Article 13 to be interpreted as meaning that ‘that law does not allow any means of challenging that act in the relevant case’ includes general provisions and principles of the law applicable to the act in addition to the insolvency rules of the law applicable to that act? |
5. |
If the answer to question 4 is affirmative,
|
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 1346/2000 of 29 May 2000 on insolvency proceedings (OJ 2000 L 160, p. 1)