Case C‑15/13
Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg
and
Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH
v
Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg)
‛Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Award of a contract without initiating a tendering procedure — In-house award — Contractor legally separate from the contracting authority — Condition of ‘similar control’ — Contracting authority and contractor not linked by a relationship of control — Third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority and control over the contractor which could be qualified as ‘similar’ — ‘Horizontal in-house transaction’’
Summary — Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 8 May 2014
Approximation of laws — Procedure for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2004/18 — Scope — Contracts awarded by a contracting authority to an entity partly owned by a third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority, albeit legally distinct from the latter — Included
(European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18, Art. 1(2)(a))
Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a contract for the supply of products concluded between (i) a university which is a contracting authority and whose purchases of products and services are controlled by a German Federal State, and (ii) an undertaking under private law, owned by the Federation and by Federal States, including the abovementioned Federal State, constitutes a public contract for the purposes of that provision, and must therefore be subject to the public procurement rules laid down in that directive.
(see para. 36, operative part)
Case C‑15/13
Technische Universität Hamburg-Harburg
and
Hochschul-Informations-System GmbH
v
Datenlotsen Informationssysteme GmbH
(Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hanseatisches Oberlandesgericht Hamburg)
‛Public supply contracts — Directive 2004/18/EC — Award of a contract without initiating a tendering procedure — In-house award — Contractor legally separate from the contracting authority — Condition of ‘similar control’ — Contracting authority and contractor not linked by a relationship of control — Third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority and control over the contractor which could be qualified as ‘similar’ — ‘Horizontal in-house transaction’’
Summary — Judgment of the Court (Fifth Chamber), 8 May 2014
Approximation of laws — Procedure for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts — Directive 2004/18 — Scope — Contracts awarded by a contracting authority to an entity partly owned by a third party public authority exercising partial control over the contracting authority, albeit legally distinct from the latter — Included
(European Parliament and Council Directive 2004/18, Art. 1(2)(a))
Article 1(2)(a) of Directive 2004/18 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts must be interpreted as meaning that a contract for the supply of products concluded between (i) a university which is a contracting authority and whose purchases of products and services are controlled by a German Federal State, and (ii) an undertaking under private law, owned by the Federation and by Federal States, including the abovementioned Federal State, constitutes a public contract for the purposes of that provision, and must therefore be subject to the public procurement rules laid down in that directive.
(see para. 36, operative part)