Order of the Court (Fifth Chamber) of 9 September 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte — Bulgaria) — ‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS v ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Development — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD

(Case C-488/13) (1)

((Reference for a preliminary ruling - Regulation (EC) No 1896/2006 - Definition of ‘uncontested pecuniary claims’ - Insolvency proceedings - Extra-judicial enforcement order relating to a contested claim - Claim for payment out of the insolvency estate, on the basis of such an enforcement order - Situation falling outside the scope of Regulation No 1896/2006 - Court clearly lacking jurisdiction))

(2014/C 431/09)

Language of the case: Bulgarian

Referring court

Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicants:‘Parva Investitsionna Banka’ AD, ‘UniKredit Bulbank’ AD, ‘Siyk Faundeyshan’ LLS

Defendants:‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD, Sindik na ‘Ear Proparti Developmant — v nesastoyatelnost’ AD

Intervening parties: Natsionalna agentsia za prihodite, ‘Aset Menidzhmant’ EAD, ‘Ol Siyz Balgaria’ OOD, ‘Si Dzhi Ef — aktsionerna obshtnost’ AD, ‘Silvar Biych’ EAD, ‘Rudersdal’ EOOD, ‘Kota Enerdzhi’ EAD, Chavdar Angelov Angelov

Operative part of the order

The Court of Justice of the European Union clearly lacks jurisdiction to answer the questions referred by the Okrazhеn sad — Тargоvishte (Bulgaria).

(1)  OJ C 344, 23.11.2013.