Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos v Commission
(Case C‑615/12 P)
‛Appeal — Action for damages — Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Claims for payment of various sums — Content of the application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded’
|
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — No such summary — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 24, 27, 32-34, 37, 38) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Conditions — Not applicable to appeals — Inadmissibility — Exceptions (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 127(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 35) |
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T‑161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585.42 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618.91 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459.38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater is ordered to pay the costs. |
Order of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 7 November 2013 — Arbos v Commission
(Case C‑615/12 P)
‛Appeal — Action for damages — Grants made for projects financed by the ‘Culture 2000’ programme — Claims for payment of various sums — Content of the application — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded’
|
1. |
Judicial proceedings — Application initiating proceedings — Formal requirements — Identification of the subject-matter of the dispute — Brief summary of the pleas in law on which the application is based — No such summary — Appeal in part manifestly inadmissible and in part manifestly unfounded (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 120(c); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 44(1)(c)) (see paras 24, 27, 32-34, 37, 38) |
|
2. |
Judicial proceedings — Introduction of new pleas during the proceedings — Conditions — Not applicable to appeals — Inadmissibility — Exceptions (Rules of Procedure of the Court of Justice, Art. 127(1); Rules of Procedure of the General Court, Art. 48(2)) (see para. 35) |
Re:
Appeal brought against the judgment of the General Court (Eighth Chamber) delivered on 25 October 2012 in Case T‑161/06 Arbos v Commission by which the General Court dismissed the action against the Commission, seeking payment of, first, the sum of EUR 38 585.42 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 January 2001 and the sum of EUR 27 618.91 together with interest at the rate of 12% from 1 March 2003 and, second, of the sum of EUR 26 459.38 excluding VAT in respect of the fees of lawyers instructed during the pre-litigation procedure — Infringement of Article 44(1)(c) of the Rules of Procedure of the General Court.
Operative part
|
1. |
The appeal is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Arbos, Gesellschaft für Musik und Theater is ordered to pay the costs. |