EUROPEAN COMMISSION
Brussels, 5.7.2023
SWD(2023) 816 final
COMMISSION STAFF WORKING DOCUMENT
2023 Rule of Law Report
Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Luxembourg
Accompanying the document
COMMUNICATION FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT, THE COUNCIL, THE EUROPEAN ECONOMIC AND SOCIAL COMMITTEE AND THE COMMITTEE OF THE REGIONS
2023 Rule of Law Report
The rule of law situation in the European Union
{COM(2023) 800 final} - {SWD(2023) 801 final} - {SWD(2023) 802 final} - {SWD(2023) 803 final} - {SWD(2023) 804 final} - {SWD(2023) 805 final} - {SWD(2023) 806 final} - {SWD(2023) 807 final} - {SWD(2023) 808 final} - {SWD(2023) 809 final} - {SWD(2023) 810 final} - {SWD(2023) 811 final} - {SWD(2023) 812 final} - {SWD(2023) 813 final} - {SWD(2023) 814 final} - {SWD(2023) 815 final} - {SWD(2023) 817 final} - {SWD(2023) 818 final} - {SWD(2023) 819 final} - {SWD(2023) 820 final} - {SWD(2023) 821 final} - {SWD(2023) 822 final} - {SWD(2023) 823 final} - {SWD(2023) 824 final} - {SWD(2023) 825 final} - {SWD(2023) 826 final} - {SWD(2023) 827 final}
Abstract
Luxembourg’s justice system has maintained its very high level of perceived judicial independence among the general public and continues to operate efficiently. The Government passed all the planned constitutional reforms, which led to the creation of the National Council for Justice and strengthening the independence of the Prosecutor’s Office. The legislative reforms regarding the composition of the National Council for Justice, which aligned it with the European standards, and the status of magistrates have also been adopted. The first pilot project regarding the digitalisation of administrative justice was launched, but further steps towards improvement are necessary. The reform aiming to make legal aid more accessible remains pending.
Resources for the prosecution services dealing with economic and financial crime as well as the overall budget for law enforcement has increased and recruitment is also expected to rise. A revision to the Constitution assigned powers to the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate and prosecute members of Government who can now be held criminally liable for corruption offences. The transparency register for members of Parliament is operational and publicly available, but its structure and implementation remain minimal and legislation on lobbying remains to be evaluated. The Codes of Conduct for members of Government and their advisers have been put in place and the transparency register is operational. Draft codes of conduct for local level political officials have been proposed. The Court of Auditors found no irregularities in relation to political party financing, while the financial control of municipalities remains with the Ministry of Internal Affairs. The law on the protection of whistleblowers was adopted covering breaches of both EU and national law.
The general legal framework establishing the regulator for audio-visual media services and its functioning remains stable, while additional tasks have been added. A new law establishes Radio 100.7 as Public Service Media, reinforcing its independence, establishing its mission and providing a stable financial framework for 2024-2030. The convention for the public service activities of the RTL Group is updated and continued for 2024-2030. A new circulaire reduces the time of processing requests from journalists for disclosure of official documents, although a fast-track option enshrined in law for the journalistic profession is not yet available. Horizontal legislation on company mergers is expected to contribute to transparency of ownership in the media sector. The framework for the protection of journalists remains robust.
The Parliament passed all the planned constitutional reforms, which include the introduction of a legislative initiative for citizens and inscribing the Ombudsperson in the Constitution. The exercise of the right of legislative initiative will be regulated by law; a draft was already tabled in Parliament. The legislative process still needs to improve in terms of openness of the public consultations. A mechanism for follow-up on non-execution of judgments is available for administrative court cases. The civic space in Luxembourg remains open and a new Government initiative provides further support for civil society organisations online.
Recommendations
Overall, concerning the recommendations in the 2022 Rule of Law Report, Luxembourg has (made):
·Fully implemented the recommendation to continue with the process to adopt the reform on the powers of the future Council for the Judiciary.
·No further progress on continuing with the process to adopt the reform on making legal aid more accessible.
·Significant progress on ensuring adequate resources for the prosecution services dealing with economic and financial crime.
·Some progress on continuing to implement and evaluate the new legislation on lobbying the Parliament, including the transparency register.
·Some progress on reducing the time of processing of requests for disclosure of official documents, taking into account European standards on access to official documents.
·No further progress on improving the legislative decision-making process by providing wider possibilities for stakeholders to participate in public consultations.
On this basis, and considering other developments that took place in the period of reference, it is recommended to Luxembourg to:
·Continue with the process to adopt the reform on making legal aid more accessible.
·Evaluate the implementation of the new legislation on lobbying the Parliament and the functioning of the transparency register and ensure that it meets the necessary transparency requirements set out in the Parliament’s rules of procedures.
·Ensure the implementation of measures adopted in relation to the time of processing of requests for disclosure of official documents, taking into account European standards on access to official documents.
·Improve the legislative decision-making process by providing wider possibilities for stakeholders to participate in public consultations.
I.Justice System
The justice system contains two separate branches of courts: ordinary courts with jurisdiction in civil and criminal matters and administrative courts hearing cases of administrative law. The ordinary branch includes three Justices of the Peace, two District Courts with general jurisdiction, a Court of Appeal and a Court of Cassation. The administrative branch is composed of an Administrative First-instance Court and an Administrative Court of Appeal. The Constitutional Court is part of the judiciary and rules on the compliance of laws with the Constitution. Since 1 July 2023, the National Council for Justice is responsible for the appointment, appraisal and disciplinary proceedings of judges and prosecutors. The Prosecutor’s Office is independent in the exercise of individual investigations and prosecutions, without prejudice to the Government's right to give direction on criminal policies. The two Bar Associations are independent and represent lawyers established in Luxembourg. Each Bar Association has an Assembly
, a Bar Council
, a President of the Bar
and for the whole profession, a Disciplinary and Administrative Council
. Luxembourg participates in the European Public Prosecutor’s Office (EPPO).
Independence
The level of perceived judicial independence in Luxembourg continues to be very high among the general public and is now high among companies. Overall, 76% of the general population and 74% of companies perceive the level of independence of courts and judges to be ‘fairly or very good’ in 2023
. According to data in the 2023 EU Justice Scoreboard, the level remains consistently very high for the general public in the last years. The perceived judicial independence among the general public has remained stable with a slight decrease in comparison with 2022 (77%), but it is higher than in 2016 (73%). The perceived judicial independence among companies has decreased in comparison with 2022 (76%), as well as in comparison with 2016 (80%).
The constitutional reform, which establishes the National Council for Justice and strengthens the independence of the Prosecutor’s Office, was adopted. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament adopted the constitutional reform establishing the National Council for Justice (NCJ) and strengthening the independence of the Prosecutor’s Office
. As mentioned in previous Rule of Law Reports
, the new constitutional provisions outline the main competences of the NCJ, namely the selection of magistrates before their appointment by the Grand Duke and taking decisions on the initiation of disciplinary proceedings against magistrates. The regime under which these powers will be exercised was established by ordinary legislation
. As regards the strengthening of independence of the Prosecutors’ Office and of the judiciary as a whole, the adopted reform enshrines the independence of judges and prosecutors in the Constitution. As already highlighted in last year’s report, judges are independent in exercising their functions, while the Prosecutor’s Office is now independent in the exercise of individual investigations and prosecutions, without prejudice to the Government’s right to give direction on general criminal policies
. The strengthening of the independence of the Prosecutor’s Office is further reflected in the legislative amendments to the Criminal Procedure Code and the Criminal Code
. These amendments were adopted on the same day, and they removed the power of the Minister of Justice to give instructions to prosecutors on individual cases
.
Legislative amendments were adopted to align the composition of the National Council for Justice with European standards. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament also adopted the draft law dealing with the organisation of the NCJ
, which came into force on 1 July 2023. In the 2022 Rule of Law Report
, it was explained that in order to align the composition of the NCJ with relevant Council of Europe standards, which recommend that at least half of the members of such councils should be judges (magistrates) elected by their peers
, the Government devised a composition of nine members: six magistrates elected by their peers – among which there would not be ex officio members but the President of the Supreme Court, the President of the Administrative Court of Appeal and the State Prosecutor General would be ex officio candidates
; one lawyer elected by their peers
; and two persons elected by the Parliament based on their education or experience
. In the final and adopted version of the law, also the ex officio candidate status for the two Presidents and the Prosecutor General was removed
. This law is in line with the Council of Europe recommendation on the composition of the councils for the judiciary
. The elections for the NCJ have been finalised
, and it started functioning on 1 July 2023.
The reform on the powers of the National Council for Justice has been adopted. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Luxembourg to “continue with the process to adopt the reform on the powers of the future NCJ”
. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament also adopted the draft law dealing with the status of magistrates
, which came into force on 1 July 2023. As mentioned in the 2022 Rule of Law Report
, this draft law sets out the powers of the NCJ over the individual magistrates – their appointment
, career advancement, secondment, and disciplinary regime
. Following the opinion of the Council of State on the draft law
and subsequent amendments, the law adopted in December 2022 allows for prosecutors to be elected and sit at the disciplinary courts. Considering these developments, the 2022 recommendation is fully implemented.
Quality
The first pilot project regarding the digitalisation of administrative justice was launched while further steps towards improvement are necessary. On 1 December 2022, a draft law accompanying the project for digitalisation of the administrative justice was tabled in Parliament
. At the same time, the first pilot project of the “paperless justice” project
was launched
and covers only emergency proceedings before the administrative courts
. The draft law is expected to be adopted over the summer. The “paperless justice” project is expected to be completed by 2026
. No concrete timeline is yet available for its evaluation nor for the launch of next projects.
. Despite this progress, the digitalisation of justice would benefit from further improvement. The procedural rules in place are only allowing a limited use of digital technology in the courts
. Shortcomings persist in the availability of digital tools to initiate and follow proceedings
. There has been no change in civil and commercial cases where it is only possible for the courts to serve documents electronically to citizens and businesses and to send electronic acknowledgement of receipt proving the submission of documents. There is no possibility to receive comprehensive information on court fees, or pay court fees online, nor access the electronic files of closed or ongoing cases
.
The reform that aims to make legal aid more accessible remains pending. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Luxembourg to “continue with the process to adopt the reform on making legal aid more accessible”
. As mentioned in the 2022 Rule of Law Report, a draft law reforming the legal aid system had been tabled in Parliament
. It was prepared by the Ministry of Justice and the Luxembourg Bar and tabled on 27 January 2022. The draft law envisages to expand the scope of application of legal aid to persons who do not hold the Luxembourgish nationality but reside in Luxembourg
and would allow for partial legal aid
. The Council of State delivered its opinion on 1 June 2023
, and it is currently being analysed by the authorities. However, no amendments to the initial draft law have been tabled so far.. Therefore, no further progress has yet been made in addressing the 2022 recommendation to continue with the process to adopt the reform.
Concerns have been raised regarding children’s access to a lawyer in practice. Although there are specific arrangements to ensure that children are assisted by a lawyer in criminal proceedings
, OKaJu (the Ombudsperson for children and youngsters) considers that the current framework for designating a lawyer is ineffective and lengthy, taking up to a year. In the meantime, the child could be arrested without having legal representation
. OKaJU has been engaged in discussions with the Luxembourg Bar aiming at improving the procedure. It should be noted that the right of children to be assisted by a lawyer is protected under EU law through the Access to Lawyer Directive
, and under the Procedural Safeguards Directive
. Furthermore, the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) considers access to a lawyer to be one of the fundamental elements of the right to a fair trial
, and individuals charged with a criminal offence have the right to access a lawyer from the early stages of a police investigation
.
Efficiency
The courts remain efficient and clearance rate shows improvements. The courts continued to perform efficiently, as the estimated time needed to resolve a case at first instance in civil, commercial or administrative proceedings in 2021 remains the same as in 2020
. Furthermore, a slight improvement is observed in the estimated time needed to resolve a case at first instance in the specific civil and commercial cases category
. The decrease in clearance rate observed in the 2022 Rule of Law Report
has been overturned, with a rate of 99% approaching again the level from before the pandemic
. The length of proceedings for litigeous civil and commercial cases at first instance remained stable
. Similarly, the length of proceedings for administrative cases at first instance also remained at the same level as in 2020
. For the first time, data are available on the length of judicial proceedings in a specific area of EU law – competition law
. Despite the relatively lengthy proceedings before the national competition authority
, the judicial proceedings in this area are among the most efficient in the EU
.
II.Anti-Corruption Framework
Luxembourg has a legal and institutional anti-corruption framework broadly in place. The Ministry of Justice is the main authority in charge of overall anti-corruption matters, including policy coordination. Within the Ministry of Justice, an intergovernmental committee, the Corruption Prevention Committee (COPRECO), acts as a consultative forum and supports the overall national policy to fight corruption. The Economic and Financial section of the Prosecution service has specific competences to investigate criminal cases of economic and financial nature, including corruption cases. The Court of Auditors is indirectly involved in the fight against corruption through its controls on the use of public funds.
The perception among experts and business executives is that the level of corruption in the public sector is relatively low. In the 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index by Transparency International, Luxembourg scores 77/100, ranks 6th in the European Union and 10th globally
. This perception has deteriorated over the past six years
. The 2023 Special Eurobarometer on Corruption shows that 40% of respondents consider corruption widespread in their country (EU average 70%) and 10% of respondents feel personally affected by corruption in their daily lives (EU average 24%)
. As regards businesses, 44% of companies consider that corruption is widespread (EU average 65%) and 35% consider that corruption is a problem when doing business (EU average 35%)
. Furthermore, 38% of respondents find that there are enough successful prosecutions to deter people from corrupt practices (EU average 32%)
, while 50% of companies believe that people and businesses caught for bribing a senior official are appropriately punished (EU average 30%)
.
The number of reported corruption cases over the past year and the number of convictions has increased. The number of corruption cases has been relatively stable over the past years
but has increased with 27 cases opened in 2022, compared to 22 in 2021
. Data for 2022 also show an increase in the number of ongoing investigations -18 compared to five in 2021 - and in convictions - six compared to one in 2021
. The Police, on the other hand, did not report any corruption cases in 2022, which reportedly can be explained by the fact that ongoing judicial investigations, due to their confidentiality, are not registered in the common police database used to compile police statistics until the cases are completed and closed by the prosecutor
. The statistics on ongoing cases are, nevertheless, registered in the Judicial Police’s own management system "JDA". However, the number of reported offenses of corruption in the police database was higher in previous years
when the same system was in place. Cooperation between EPPO and the police is considered to be adequate and it is excellent with the national prosecution offices
.
Significant progress has been made on increasing the resources for the prosecution services dealing with economic and financial crime and for the law enforcement authorities and recruitment is expected to rise. The 2022 Rule of Law report recommended to Luxembourg to ‘ensure that there are adequate resources for the prosecution services dealing with economic and financial crime’
. The number of prosecutors at the economic and financial crime section of the Prosecutor’s Office increased by three in 2023 to a total of 16 and the Prosecution Service intends to recruit more magistrates in 2024
. Following the adoption of the law of 23 December 2022 on legal advisers
, the prosecution service expects a 15 percent increase in the number of magistrates at the economic and financial section
. However, no change has occurred in the administrative staffing of this section
. The overall budget for the law enforcement authorities has also increased
, including the number of police recruitments
, but it is not clear to what extent this will benefit specifically the Department for Economic and Financial Crime dealing with anti-corruption. Therefore, in light of these developments there has been significant progress on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
A revision to the Constitution assigned powers to the Prosecutor’s Office to investigate and prosecute members of Government. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament adopted the constitutional reform that allows the Prosecutor’s Office to instigate and conduct criminal proceedings against a member of Government for acts committed in the exercise of their duties
. The constitutional amendment abolishes the Parliament’s exclusive right to bring charges against members of Government, assigning that power to the Prosecutor’s Office instead. To fill the gap until the constitutional amendment’s entry into force in July, the law of 3 March 2023
implements the provisions on the criminal liability of members of Government
. The Prosecutor’s Office has welcomed the forthcoming constitutional amendment as the normal criminal procedural rules will then also apply to members of Government
.
The Corruption Prevention Committee resumed its normal operations and met twice, though no recommendations or measures were proposed. The intergovernmental Corruption Prevention Committee (COPRECO) resumed its normal operations in 2022
. The Committee will focus much of its attention in 2023 on the ongoing evaluation of Luxembourg by the OECD
. During the two meetings that took place in 2022, COPRECO discussed the situation after the COVID-19 pandemic and informed its new members about ongoing assessments of the anti-corruption framework by international bodies and the state of play of legislation in progress or adopted
. It did not present or propose any recommendations or specific measures in the past year. COPRECO does not report on its meetings, nor is it required to do so, which is seen as a lack of transparency according to civil society organisations
. Although COPRECO is set up as an inter-ministerial committee, representatives from the private sector such as the financial sector and the Chamber of Commerce are invited regularly
. Depending on the topics to be discussed, COPRECO may also invite civil society organisations, although this does not happen structurally, which indicates a potential imbalance in its consultation of external stakeholders. Luxembourg does not have a specialised anti-corruption body or an anti-corruption strategy and there are currently no plans to change the current set-up
of COPRECO into a specific anti-corruption body within the meaning of the UN Convention against Corruption
.
Some progress has been made on lobbying, since the implementation of the transparency register for Members of Parliament is minimal and the legislation remains to be evaluated. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Luxembourg to ‘continue to implement and evaluate the new legislation on lobbying the Parliament, including the transparency register’
. As reported in the previous Rule of Law report
, the transparency register was created by law on 9 December 2021
. The transparency register became operational and is publicly available through the website of the Parliament
. Members of Parliament must reject any request for a meeting with persons or organisations, which are not registered. However, the information in the transparency register is limited and does not yet include the information required by the amendment to the Rules of Procedure of the Chamber of Deputies on the transparency register
. Both the content and the format of the register have been criticised as insufficient for ensuring transparency
. Due to the recent set up of the register, there has not yet been any evaluation of the functioning of the transparency register, and none is currently planned
. Overall, there has been some progress on the implementation of the recommendation made in the 2022 Rule of Law Report.
A register to increase transparency about meetings between members of the Government, their advisers and third parties, is operational and publicly available, and draft codes of conduct for local level political officials have been proposed. Following the implementation in May 2022 of the Codes of Conduct for members of the Government and their advisers
, meetings between members of Government, advisers and representatives of interest groups or other third parties have to be registered, provided that their purpose is to influence the Government’s legislative or regulatory activity
. Besides organisational information about the meeting and attendees, the register should also include a summary of the stakeholders’ positions about such legislative or regulatory activities, or the laws or regulations adopted or planned which were discussed
. The register is meant to remain permanently available
. According to the Government, the technical implementation of the transparency register was the biggest challenge following the adoption of these Codes of Conduct, but the register is reportedly functioning well
. Following the Grand Ducal Decree of 14 March 2022
that increased its powers, the Ethics Committee
can publish communiqués on breaches of the Code of Conduct. The Ethics Committee may also at any time issue recommendations to strengthen the Code of Conduct
. Progress to address the gap identified in last year’s Rule of Law Report
has been made as regards elected representatives at municipal level. A draft law and a draft Grand-Ducal Regulation
were tabled in July 2022 with the aim to introduce ethical principles applicable to municipal councilors in the exercise of their functions and strengthen transparency in the exercise of local politics and administration. It also envisages the establishment of a committee of ethics for municipal councilors to advise on the application of the ethical principles
. The law will include rules on the limits of the amount of the gifts which municipal councilors may accept and an obligation for them to make a declaration of their real estate assets (including those of their spouses) and interests within one month of their taking office
. The Government is awaiting the opinion of the Council of State and intends to adopt the draft law and regulation in 2024
. As reported last year, there is no specific code of conduct for civil servants at local level, which constitutes an important gap
, and civil society has been asking for the development of such a code
. Civil servants at local level are subject to the Municipal Code, which sets out their rights and duties in general, as well as disciplinary measures. Furthermore, the transparency and integrity charter for the General Police Inspectorate was implemented on 1 May 2022.
The Court of Auditors found no irregularities in relation to political party financing, while the financial control of municipalities remains with the Ministry of Internal Affairs. There have been no new developments concerning audits of political party financing since the political party financing rules only apply during elections
, which are taking place in October 2023
. The Court of Auditors is responsible for the annual control of political party financing. It did not detect any irregularities or suspicions of corruption in 2022
. Furthermore, where public resources are used to finance political parties, the Court of Auditors audits all the accounts and balance sheets of parties at national and local level who have obtained at least 2% of the total votes
. The law on political party financing
obliges political parties to register all donations above EUR 250 and make them public through the register of donations. Political parties may only accept donations from natural persons. The Court of Auditors does not check the gifts for individual members of Parliament
. In case of a breach of the Parliament’s Code of Conduct, the Parliament’s Advisory Committee has the competence to give guidance on the interpretation of the Code
. The Court of Auditors did not find any irregularities with regards to public procurement
, which the Court checks systematically
. While the Court can at any time oversee the use of public funds given to any public or private legal entity in specific investment cases at local level, it has no general oversight power at the level of municipalities since financial control of the municipalities is done by the Ministry of Internal Affairs. To ensure independent oversight at all levels of government, the Court has in the past requested that its oversight responsibilities be also extended to the municipal level
.
The law aiming to transpose the Whistleblower Directive, amended following an opinion issued by the Council of State, has been adopted. As noted in the previous Rule of Law report
, the Government adopted a draft law aiming to transpose the Whistleblower Directive
. Following an opinion on the draft law by the Council of State, the Government of Luxembourg amended the draft law and published the law on 17 May 2023 in the national gazette
. The scope of the law is broader than the EU directive
, as it covers all offenses that harm the public interests
.
Measures are being taken to further strengthen collaboration to tackle financial crimes. Following the COVID-19 pandemic and the growing threat in relation to government support schemes
, the police is monitoring potentially fraudulent transactions at local, regional and national level. This system enables closer collaboration between the services involved in the detection of financial crimes such as fraud, money laundering and corruption of public funds. The system might be expanded to an official database
. On 5 July 2022, the law on management and recovery of seized or confiscated assets
came into force. This obliges all actors, in particular banking establishments and financial service providers, to inform the authorities no later than 1 May 2023 of all assets seized within the framework of criminal proceedings, domestic or foreign. According to civil society, the law will benefit international corruption related work
.
III.Media Pluralism and Media Freedom
The legal framework concerning media freedom and pluralism comprises a set of constitutional and legislative safeguards. Freedom of expression is explicitly recognised in the Constitution. The Law on Freedom of Expression in Media ensures protection for journalists
. The Law on Electronic Media guarantees the financial and administrative independence of the audiovisual media regulator. The Law on Open and Transparent Administration regulates access to information held by public authorities and bodies.
While the general legal framework establishing the regulator for audio-visual media services and its functioning remains stable, additional tasks have been added. Amendments to the electoral provisions introduced by Law of 22 July 2022 have added two additional tasks to the Luxembourg Independent Authority for Audiovisual Media (ALIA). ALIA is to draw up guidelines on the conditions for the production, programming and broadcasting of election messages of political parties and groups of candidates as well as programmes relating to the electoral media campaign that audiovisual or audio media service providers entrusted with a public service mission are required to broadcast
. As regards its resources, there have been no significant changes since the publication of the 2022 Rule of Law Report despite the increase of its tasks. ALIA has asked for a substantial increase of human and financial resources to deal efficiently with its many tasks, for instance, in the context of electoral campaigns and in the area of media literacy and European affairs
.
New provisions to control company mergers, when introduced, could contribute to improve transparency of media ownership. The analysis of results of the public consultation opened in January 2022 on possible measures to generally control company mergers is being finalised and a draft law is expected before the summer
. Given the highly concentrated media landscape with an ownership structure that is not fully transparent and accessible
, the possible introduction of such a general regime could also contribute to transparency of media ownership. Further measures to improve transparency of media ownership may be implemented in the future, but the Government awaits the adoption of the European Media Freedom Act (EMFA) to have a solid ground on which to base them and to avoid creating any legal confusion before the EMFA is adopted
.
The independence of public Radio 100,7 was reinforced. The Parliament adopted the law on the organisation of the public entity “Média de service public 100,7”
. The law strengthens the Luxembourg public service radio, which is now referred to as “public service media” and not just “radio”, thus opening options for presence in other media than radio, for instance online. Its missions and governance are revised, and its financing secured. Radio 100,7 is now called upon to develop a generalist programme of information, culture and entertainment. The programme will also have to continue to reflect the values of the public service through objective, independent and pluralistic media coverage, promoting democratic values, in particular respect for fundamental rights. The independence of the Radio 100,7 management board is strengthened, with six new independent members from civil society and state representatives reduced to three (previously four). The law also calls for regular audience consultation through advisory meetings or other appropriate means. As an independent public institution with legal personality and financial and administrative autonomy, the 100,7 media will have to organise itself in such a way as to guarantee its autonomy and independence with regard to editorial decisions. The funding of the service is guaranteed, multi-year and stable. A Multiannual (2024-2030) Convention
between the Government and the Public Service Media 100,7 was signed on 31 March 2023
. The budget for 2024 increases by more than 25%
and a total allocation for a 7-year period envisages almost EUR 80 million to pursue Radio 100,7 current activities, continue the development of online services and keep up with innovation in technology. Advertising will continue to be prohibited on air and on the website, although sponsorship will continue to be allowed under strict conditions
.
The Multiannual Convention with RTL Group for their “public service mission” activities was renewed
. RTL Group is a private undertaking control by the Bertelsmann group with no direct or indirect participation of the LU Government
. On 14 June 2022, Luxembourg renewed for a period of seven years (2024-2030) the convention with RTL Group currently in place, since 2021. The convention covers RTL Group’s “public service mission” activities in television, radio and online. New commitments are included in this new convention, namely, the commitment of RTL to create a programme for children and to establish, in collaboration with the University of Luxembourg, a so-called “Media Centre” to promote media education. The convention also includes support measures for the local cinematographic and audiovisual sector through enhanced cooperation between RTL and the national support fund for audiovisual production. The Government provides for a guarantee to cover parts of the costs related to the production of some agreed TV and radio programmes and related digital activities, based on a defined set of criteria and an annual maximum amount of EUR 15 million
.
Some progress has been made to reduce the time of processing requests from journalists for disclosure of official documents, while some demands from journalists remain unaddressed
. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Luxembourg to “reduce the time of processing of requests for disclosure of official documents, taking into account European standards on access to official documents”
. While the law on general access to information and documents
is still under evaluation, on 27 June 2022 the Government issued a lettre circulaire to the services in the administration concerning the “rights and obligations of state servants in their relations with the press”
. Its purpose is to establish a uniform procedure to respond to journalists’ requests for information, easing the flow of information and respecting the timely responses required by journalistic work. It instructs state agents to reply to press requests within 24 hours, with the information required or an estimate of the time needed to reply or indicating the legal reasons why the information cannot be provided. However, journalists consider the circulaire insufficient, as its nature entails that there is no right to challenge the decision of the administration on access to information before the courts. Journalists’ representatives have reiterated that the exercise of their profession needs a fast-track option, different from the general right to access to information for citizens
. They have been calling on the Government to introduce such a procedure in the law of 8 June 2004 on freedom of expression in the media
. Therefore, some progress has been made.
The professional environment for journalists continues to be safe. The framework for the protection of journalists remains robust
. The Council of Europe Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists has not registered any alerts for Luxembourg for 2022 and 2023
. Since the 2020 Rule of Law Report
, no major legislative developments have taken place as regards the framework for the protection of journalists. Criminal defamation prosecutions against the media continue to be scarce, but journalists reiterate their concern that lawsuits may be used to intimidate media and journalists with new cases emerging sporadically
. The Government provides financial support to the Press Council and the Luxembourg Professional Association of Journalists, which covers partially the expenses related to the legal protection of their members
.
IV.Other Institutional Issues related to Checks and Balances
Luxembourg is a unicameral
parliamentary democracy, in which legislative proposals can originate from the Government and from members of Parliament. The Council of State gives an advisory opinion on draft legislation, whether proposed by the Government or by members of Parliament. The Constitutional Court scrutinises the constitutionality of legislation. Independent authorities, such as the Consultative Commission for Human Rights (CCDH), the Ombudsperson and the Ombudsperson for children and youngsters, play an important role in the system of checks and balances.
The constitutional reform introducing a legislative initiative for citizens was adopted. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament adopted the constitutional reform establishing the right of legislative initiative for citizens
. The adopted constitutional reform provides that Parliament decides in public session on the reasoned proposals for the purposes of legislating, presented by 125 citizens and supported by at least 12 500 citizens having the right to vote
. The new text also specifies that the exercise of this right of legislative initiative would be regulated by law. A draft law tabled in Parliament at the same time
sets out the scope of the legislative initiative
, the conditions for its admissibility
, and the detailed procedure before the Parliament
. Following an opinion of the Council of State
, new amendments were tabled before the Parliament on 17 May 2023. The expectations are that the draft law would be adopted during the summer of 2023
.
The legislative process has not improved in terms of openness of the public consultations. The 2022 Rule of Law Report recommended to Luxembourg to “improve the legislative decision-making process by providing wider possibilities for stakeholders to participate in public consultations”
. As mentioned in the 2021 and 2022 Rule of Law Reports
, concerns have been raised as regards the regularity and extent of stakeholder consultations in the decision-making process. Throughout the ordinary legislative procedure, a consultative opinion of the Council of State is mandatory for every proposed legislation. In addition, there are five professional chambers
, which are consulted in their respective field of expertise. The consultations with the Consultative Commission for Human Rights (CCDH)
continue to take place, as described in the 2022 Report
. The CCDH is regularly consulted on legislation potentially affecting the fundamental rights of citizens
, but continue not to be consulted when it comes to non-legislative measures, such as ordinances
. However, according to a recent report, the process does not appear to be structurally open
, in particular to stakeholders
. Stakeholders also confirmed that the situation remains the same as in previous years and there was no effective follow-up by state authorities to improve the possibilities for stakeholders to participate in public consultations
. Thus, there has been no further progress in addressing the 2022 recommendation.
The Ombudsperson was inscribed in the Constitution, following the adoption of a constitutional reform. On 21 December 2022, the Parliament adopted the constitutional reform dealing with the powers of the Parliament
, which anchors the institution of the Ombudsperson in the Constitution. As mentioned in the 2022 Rule of Law Report
, a comprehensive constitutional reform had been proposed but eventually put aside in 2019
, and was later followed by the reintroduction of the provision related to the Ombudsperson in the targeted constitutional revision mentioned above. As mentioned in last year’s report
, the Ombudsperson recommended modifying the law establishing the Ombudsperson institution
in order to introduce the right to an own-initiative opinion and expand some other competencies. This proposal has not yet received any follow-up from the authorities
.
On 1 January 2023, Luxembourg had one judgment of the European Court of Human Rights pending implementation, an increase of one compared to the previous year
. The case concerns a breach of the right to access to a court due to the inadmissibility of a cassation appeal in civil matters based on excessive formalism by the Court of Cassation
. As of 1 January 2023, Luxembourg’s rate of leading judgments from the past 10 years that remain pending was at 25% (compared to 0% at the start of 2022)
. The judgment has been pending for almost 12 months. On 15 June 2023, the number of leading judgments pending implementation has increased to two
.
Mechanisms for follow-up on non-execution of judgments are available for administrative cases. In case of a non-execution of a judgment by an organ of the administration for more than three months, the concerned party can seize the court that pronounced the judgment in order to appoint a special commissioner. The special commissioner will then take the necessary action for the authority that has to execute the decision
. When the decision should be taken by a decentralised public person or by a deconcentrated authority, this special commissioner is chosen from among the senior civil servants of the supervising ministry, or the ministry having a direct link with the legal person of public law concerned
. In other cases, the special commissioner is chosen from among the members of the court
. Other mechanisms in case of a non-execution of a judgment from the organs of the administration also exist. Firstly, the court which pronounced the judgment can recall the judgement by announcing it again, to remind the administrative authority concerned about the necessary actions to be taken. Moreover, the court can decide to publish the judgment in the Official Journal to make it more visible
.
A new Government initiative provides further support for civil society organisations online. The civic space remains open
. Since the publication of the 2022 Rule of Law Report, there have been no changes to the legislative framework regarding civil society organisations (CSOs). Stakeholders have reported that the work environment for CSOs has been safe and enabling, and does not call for changes
. With the online world becoming a more prominent working place for everyone, including CSOs, the Government launched an initiative called “BEE SECURE”, which promotes a safer, more responsible and more positive use of digital technology and online environments
. The platform provides a general point of information and point of contact for questions related to online security and the responsible use of communication technology. It also offers a supporting service to anonymously report potential illegal content encountered online
.
Annex I: List of sources in alphabetical order*
* The list of contributions received in the context of the consultation for the 2023 Rule of Law report can be found at
https://commission.europa.eu/publications/2023-rule-law-report-targeted-stakeholder-consultation_en
.
CCDH (2023), Written contribution from the CCDH for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Civicus, Monitor tracking civic space – Luxembourg
https://monitor.civicus.org/country/luzembourg/
.
Council of Europe: Committee of Ministers (2010), Recommendation CM/Rec(2010)12 of the Committee of Ministers to member states on judges: independence, efficiency and responsibilities.
Council of Europe: Venice Commission (2020), Bulgaria - Urgent interim opinion on the draft new constitution opinion (CDL-AD(2020)035).
Council of Europe, Platform to promote the protection of journalism and safety of journalists
Directorate-General for Communication (2023), Special Eurobarometer 534: corruption
Draft Grand-Ducal Regulation laying down the composition, organisation, operation and attendance of the Municipal Councillor’s Ethics Committee and the content of the declaration of interests and the declaration of property of municipal councillors
https://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/pr/20220102
.
ENNHRI (2023), Written contribution from ENNHRI for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 12 October 2021, Foyer Assurances S.A. v. Luxembourg 35245/18.
European Committee of Social Rights Decision of 20 October 2020, International Commission of Jurists (ICJ) v. Czech Republic, Complaint No. 148/2017.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 27 November 2008, Salduz v. Turkey [GC], 36391/02.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 13 September 2016, Ibrahim and Others v. the United Kingdom [GC], 50541/08 et al.
European Court of Human Rights, judgment of 9 November 2018, Beuze v. Belgium, 71409/10.
European Commission (2020), 2020 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Luxembourg.
European Commission (2021), 2021 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Luxembourg.
European Commission (2022), 2022 Rule of Law Report, Country Chapter on the rule of law situation in Luxembourg.
European Commission (2023), The EU Justice Scoreboard.
European Network of National Human Rights Institutions (2023), European Network of National Human Rights Institutions contribution for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2003), Council Directive 2002/8/EC of 27 January 2003 to improve access to justice in cross-border disputes by establishing minimum common rules relating to legal aid for such disputes
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2013), Directive 2013/48/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 22 October 2013 on the right of access to a lawyer in criminal proceedings and in European arrest warrant proceedings, and on the right to have a third party informed upon deprivation of liberty and to communicate with third persons and with consular authorities while deprived of liberty.
European Parliament and Council of the European Union (2016), Directive 2016/800 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2016 on procedural safeguards for children who are suspects or accused persons in criminal proceedings
European Public Prosecutor’s Office (2023), Annual Report 2022.
GRECO (2022), Fifth Evaluation Round - Second Compliance Report on Luxembourg on preventing corruption and promoting integrity in central governments (top executive functions) and law enforcement agencies.
Luxembourg Government (2022), Circulaire Bettel:
https://gouvernement.lu/dam-assets/documents/actualites/2022/06-juin/27-bettel-circulaire/20220727-lettre-circulaire-aux-departements-ministeriels-public.pdf
.
Luxembourg Government (2023), Input from Luxembourg for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Media Pluralism Monitor 2023, Country report for Luxembourg.
Multiannual Convention between the Government and the Public Service Media 100,7 (2024-2030).
https://gouvernement.lu/dam-assets/documents/actualites/2023/03-mars/31-convention-media-service-public/convention-31032023.pdf
.
Online platform, BEE SECURE -
https://www.bee-secure.lu/fr/a-propos/
.
Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (2022), Better Regulation Practices across the European Union 2022.
Government of Luxembourg (2022), Press release regarding the signing of the Multiannual Convention with RTL Group
https://smc.gouvernement.lu/fr/support/recherche.gouvernement%2Bfr%2Bactualites%2Btoutes_actualites%2Bcommuniques%2B2022%2B06-juin%2B14-bettel-convention.html
.
Government of Luxembourg (2023), Press release regarding the signing of the Multiannual Convention with Radio 100,7
https://smc.gouvernement.lu/fr/actualites.gouvernement%2Bfr%2Bactualites%2Btoutes_actualites%2Bcommuniques%2B2023%2B03-mars%2B31-convention-media-service-public.html
.
Project No. 6030, A new draft Constitution
http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/ppc/10000
.
Project No. 7323A, Draft law on the organisation of the Council for the judiciary
https://beta.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/pl/20170534
.
Project No. 7323B, Draft law on the organisation of the Council for the judiciary
https://beta.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/pl/20170561
.
Project No. 7575, Revision of Chapter VI (on Justice) of the Constitution, full text of the project
http://data.legilux.public.lu/file2/2021-02-24/23
.
Project No. 7777, Proposition for revision of Chapters IV and Vbis of the Constitution
http://legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/ppc/20130260
.
Project No. 7959, Draft law on the organisation of legal aid and repealing article 37-1 of the amended law of 10 August 1991 on the legal profession.
https://beta.legilux.public.lu/eli/etat/projet/pl/20170566
.
Project No. 8037, Draft law on the reasoned proposals for the purpose of legislating.
Project No. 8052, Draft law amending: 1° of the amended municipal law of 13 December 1988; 2° of the Criminal Code; 3° of the amended Law of 19 July 2004 on municipal development and urban development
https://www.chd.lu/en/dossier/8052
.
Project No. 8109, Draft law accompanying the project for digitalisation of the administrative justice.
Recommendation 51, Modification of the Law of 22 August 2003 on the establishment of the Ombudsperson. -
https://www.ombudsman.lu/uploads/RC/RC51.pdf
.
Transparency International (2023), 2022 Corruption Perception Index.
UNODC (2015) Country Review Report of Luxembourg.
Reporters without Borders - Luxembourg:
https://rsf.org/en/country/luxembourg
UN, OHCHR (2023), Written contribution from the OHCHR for the 2023 Rule of Law Report.
Annex II: Country visit to Luxembourg
The Commission services held virtual meetings in March 2023 with:
·Chambre des Députés (Parliament)
·Committee for the Prevention of Corruption (COPRECO)
·Constitutional Court
·Consultative Commission for Human Rights (CCDH)
·Council of State
·Court of Audit
·Groupement des magistrats Luxembourgeois
·Initiative devoir de vigilance
·Internal Security Service
·Luxembourg Association of Journalists (ALJP)
·Luxembourgish Media Regulator (ALIA)
·Ministry of Foreign and European Affairs
·Ministry of Interior
·Ministry of Justice
·Ministry of State
·Ombdusperson for children (OKaJu)
·Police Grand Ducal
·Press Council of Luxembourg
·Prosecution service
·Public service media 100,7
·Supreme Court of Justice
·The Commission for access to documents
* The Commission also met the following organisations in a number of horizontal meetings:
·ALDA (European Association for Local Democracy)
·Amnesty International
·Civil Liberties Union for Europe
·Civil Society Europe
·Culture Action Europe
·European Centre for Press and Media Freedom
·European Civic Forum
·European Federation of Journalists
·European Partnership for Democracy
·European Youth Forum
·Free Press Unlimited
·Front Line Defenders
·ILGA Europe
·International Commission of Jurists
·International Federation for Human Rights (FIDH)
·International Planned Parenthood Federation European Network
·International Press Institute
·JEF Europe
·Osservatorio Balcani e Caucaso Transeuropa
·Philea
·Reporters Without Borders
·SOLIDAR
·Transparency International EU