(1)

By Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 412/2013 (2) definitive anti-dumping duties were imposed on imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware originating in the People’s Republic of China. Following an expiry review investigation pursuant to Article 11(2) of the basic Regulation, the Commission prolonged the measures by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1198 (3) (‘the measures in force’). Subsequently, following an anti-circumvention investigation the Commission decided, by Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131 (4), to make several companies previously subject to an individual dumping duty rate of 17,9 % subject to the duty rate of 36,1 % applicable to ‘all other companies’ and repeal their individual TARIC additional code.

(2)

By Article 1(2) of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131 the TARIC additional code B632, which had been attributed to the company Liling Jiaxing Ceramic Industrial Co., Ltd. (‘Jiaxing’) was replaced with the TARIC additional code B999. The Commission repealed the individual TARIC additional code based on a relationship with another company, having TARIC additional code B610, which had been found to circumvent (5). As a consequence, imports of ceramic tableware and kitchenware produced by Jiaxing became subject to the duty rate of 36,1 % applicable to ‘all other companies’ as of the entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131. Following the publication thereof, Jiaxing alleged that it had not been properly informed on the Commission’s intention to change its individual duty rate and make it subject to the duty rate applicable to all other companies. Jiaxing argued that it had therefore been unable to fully and effectively exercise the right of defence. Moreover, it submitted evidence that it was not anymore related to the company with TARIC additional code B610.

(3)

In this respect, the Commission acknowledged that Jiaxing had not been put in a position to effectively exercise its right of defence and that there was no relationships with any other company found to be circumventing. Therefore, the outcome of the investigation vis-à-vis Jiaxing would had been different had it been given the opportunity to fully exercise its rights of defence during the anti-circumvention investigation.

(4)

Accordingly, it is appropriate to amend Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1198, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131, and to reattribute the TARIC additional code B632 to Liling Jiaxing Ceramic Industrial Co., Ltd., whose imports should have kept being subject to a duty rate of 17,9 %.

(5)

Imports from Jiaxing to the Union have been subject to a duty rate of 36,1 % since the 13 December 2019 when Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131, amending Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1198, entered into force. As explained in recitals (3) and (4) above, those imports would have been subject to a duty rate of 17,9 % had Jiaxing been put in a position to effectively exercise its rights. Therefore, it is considered appropriate that TARIC additional code B632, subject to a duty rate of 17,9 %, should be applied to the company Liling Jiaxing Ceramic Industrial Co., Ltd. retroactively as from the date of the entry into force of Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131.

(6)

It follows that the amount of definitive duties paid pursuant to Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/1198, as amended by Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/2131 for imports from Jiaxing in excess of the duty rate of 17,9 % shall be repaid or remitted.

(7)

The measures provided for in this Regulation are in accordance with the opinion of the Committee established by Article 15(1) of Regulation (EU) 2016/1036,