Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0075

    Case T-75/23: Action brought on 15 February 2023 — RT France v Council

    OJ C 127, 11.4.2023, p. 50–51 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    11.4.2023   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 127/50

    Action brought on 15 February 2023 — RT France v Council

    (Case T-75/23)

    (2023/C 127/61)

    Language of the case: French

    Parties

    Applicant: RT France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: E. Piwnica, lawyer)

    Defendant: Council of the European Union

    Forms of order sought

    The applicant claims that the General Court should:

    —

    annul Council Decision (CFSP) 2022/2477 of 16 December 2022, amending Decision 2014/145/CFSP concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it concerns the association ‘TV-Novosti’ and the companies in its ownership;

    —

    annul Council Implementing Regulation (EU) No 2022/2476 of 16 December 2022 implementing Regulation (EU) No 269/2014 concerning restrictive measures in respect of actions undermining or threatening the territorial integrity, sovereignty and independence of Ukraine, in so far as it concerns the association ‘TV-Novosti’ and the companies in its ownership;

    —

    order the Council of the European Union to bear the costs;

    —

    with all the legal consequences that entails.

    Pleas in law and main arguments

    In support of its action, the applicant relies on four pleas in law.

    1.

    First plea in law, alleging that the Council disregarded its obligation to state reasons.

    2.

    Second plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed the right to property under Article 17 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union.

    3.

    Third plea in law, alleging that the Council infringed the freedom to conduct a business under Article 16 of the Charter of Fundamental Rights.

    4.

    Fourth plea, alleging that the Council erred in its assessment of the facts, thereby vitiating the contested measures.
    Top