Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018TN0199

Case T-199/18: Action brought on 16 March 2018 — SCF Terminal (Cyprus) and S H B v Council and Others

OJ C 231, 2.7.2018, p. 26–27 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

201806150751955192018/C 231/331992018TC23120180702EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180316262722

Case T-199/18: Action brought on 16 March 2018 — SCF Terminal (Cyprus) and S H B v Council and Others

Top

C2312018EN2620120180316EN0033262272

Action brought on 16 March 2018 — SCF Terminal (Cyprus) and S H B v Council and Others

(Case T-199/18)

2018/C 231/33Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicants: SCF Terminal (Cyprus) LTD (Limassol, Cyprus) and S H B, Inc. (Monrovia, Liberia) (represented by: P. Tridimas, Barrister, K. Kakoulli, P. Panayides and C. Pericleous, lawyers)

Defendants: Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Central Bank, Eurogroup and European Union

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the Court should:

order the defendants to pay the applicants the sums shown in the schedule annexed to this application plus interest accruing from 26 March 2013 until the judgment of the Court;

order the defendants to pay the costs.

In the alternative, by way of subsidiary claim, the applicants request the Court to:

find that the European Union and/or the defendant institutions have incurred non-contractual liability;

determine the procedure to be followed in order to establish the recoverable loss actually suffered by the applicants; and

order the defendants to pay the costs.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on four pleas in law which are in essence identical or similar to those relied on in Case T-197/18, JV Voscf and Others v Council and Others.

Top