Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62016TA0315

Case T-315/16: Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for EU word mark Butterfly — Earlier EU word mark and national trade name Butterfly — Relative grounds for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) and (4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

OJ C 369, 30.10.2017, p. 13–14 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

30.10.2017   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 369/13


Judgment of the General Court of 19 September 2017 — Tamasu Butterfly Europa v EUIPO — adp Gauselmann (Butterfly)

(Case T-315/16) (1)

((EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for EU word mark Butterfly - Earlier EU word mark and national trade name Butterfly - Relative grounds for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) and (4) and (5) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009))

(2017/C 369/18)

Language of the case: German

Parties

Applicant: Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH (Moers, Germany) (represented by: C. Röhl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: R. Pethke and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: adp Gauselmann GmbH (Espelkamp, Germany) (represented by: P. Koch Moreno, lawyer)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 March 2016 (Case R 221/2015-1) relating to opposition proceedings between Tamasu Butterfly Europa and adp Gauselmann.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Tamasu Butterfly Europa GmbH to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 287, 8.8.2016.


Top