Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0455

Case C-455/14 P: Appeal brought on 29 September 2014 by H against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10: H v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Police Mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina ( ‘EUPM’ )

OJ C 448, 15.12.2014, p. 10–11 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

15.12.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 448/10


Appeal brought on 29 September 2014 by H against the order of the General Court (Ninth Chamber) delivered on 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10: H v Council of the European Union, European Commission, European Police Mission in Bosnia-Herzegovina (‘EUPM’)

(Case C-455/14 P)

(2014/C 448/13)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Appellant: H (represented by: M. Velardo, avvocato)

Other parties to the proceedings: Council of the European Union, European Commission

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

set aside the order of the General Court of 10 July 2014 in Case T-271/10 H v. Council of the European Union, European Commission and ‘EUPM’, insofar as it rejects the Applicant’s action seeking the annulment of the decision of 7 April 2010, signed by the Head of the personnel of the EUPM, by which the Applicant was redeployed to the post of ‘Criminal Justice Adviser-Prosecutor’ in the regional office of Banja Luka (Bosnia and Herzegovina) and, if necessary, of the decision of 30 April 2010, signed by the Head of Mission, referred to in Article 6 of the Council Decision 2009/906/CFSP of 8 December 2009, on the European Union Police Mission (EUPM) in Bosnia and Herzegovina (BiH) (1), and second, for damages;

refer the case back to the General Court;

order the defendant at first instance to pay the costs of these proceedings.

Pleas in law and main arguments

The Appellant is putting forward the following pleas in law:

Infringement of the right of defence

Infringement of Article 114 of the Rules of Procedure

Error in law

Infringement of European Law


(1)  OJ L 322, p. 22


Top