This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TA0206
Case T-206/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-206/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
Case T-206/21: Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals — Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal — Relative ground for refusal — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
OJ C 207, 23.5.2022, p. 39–39
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 207, 23.5.2022, p. 26–26
(GA)
|
23.5.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 207/39 |
Judgment of the General Court of 30 March 2022 — Kalita and Haas v EUIPO — Kitzbühel Tourismus (Representation of two animals)
(Case T-206/21) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for an EU figurative mark representing two animals - Earlier EU figurative mark representing an animal - Relative ground for refusal - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)
(2022/C 207/51)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicants: Oliver Kalita (Jochberg, Austria), Christian Haas (Kitzbühel, Austria) (represented by: G. Donath, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Graul and D. Hanf, acting as Agents)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts (Kitzbühel) (represented by: M. Horak, lawyer)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 2 February 2021 (Case R 863/2020-1), relating to opposition proceedings between, on the one hand, Kitzbühel Tourismus and, on the other, Mr Kalita and Mr Haas.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Annuls the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 2 February 2021 (Case R 863/2021-1); |
|
2. |
Orders EUIPO to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Oliver Kalita and Mr Christian Haas; |
|
3. |
Orders Kitzbühel Tourismus, Körperschaft des öffentlichen Rechts to pay, in addition to its own costs, half of the costs incurred by Mr Kalita and Mr Haas. |