This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TA0664
Case T-664/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy — Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-664/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy — Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
Case T-664/22: Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy — Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
OJ C 338, 25.9.2023, p. 23–23
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
25.9.2023 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 338/23 |
Judgment of the General Court of 26 July 2023 — Mood Media Netherlands v EUIPO — Tailoradio (VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy)
(Case T-664/22) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for the EU figurative mark VIDEO MOOD Digital Signage, made easy - Earlier EU figurative mark MOOD:MIX - Relative ground for refusal - No likelihood of confusion - Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 (now Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001))
(2023/C 338/30)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Mood Media Netherlands BV (Naarden, Netherlands) (represented by: A. M. Pecoraro, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Frydendahl, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Tailoradio Srl (Milan, Italy) (represented by A. Sobol and S. Bernardini, lawyers)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 23 August 2022 (Case R 1852/2018-5).
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
|
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
|
2. |
Orders Mood Media Netherlands BV to bear its own costs and to pay the costs incurred by Tailoradio Srl in the proceedings before the General Court; |
|
3. |
Orders the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) to bear its own costs. |