This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62016TB0078
Case T-78/16: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Sartour v Parliament (Public service contracts — Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament — Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Cancellation of the call for tenders — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-78/16: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Sartour v Parliament (Public service contracts — Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament — Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Cancellation of the call for tenders — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-78/16: Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Sartour v Parliament (Public service contracts — Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament — Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer — Cancellation of the call for tenders — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 410, 7.11.2016, p. 21–21
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
7.11.2016 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 410/21 |
Order of the General Court of 16 September 2016 — Sartour v Parliament
(Case T-78/16) (1)
((Public service contracts - Food concession in a building occupied by the Parliament - Rejection of the tender of a tenderer and award of the contract to another tenderer - Cancellation of the call for tenders - No need to adjudicate))
(2016/C 410/29)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Sartour (Beveren, Belgium) (represented by: M. Cherchi, lawyer)
Defendant: European Parliament (represented by: Z Nagy and S. Toliušis, acting as Agents)
Re:
Application based on Article 263 TFEU and asking for annulment, first, of the European Parliament’s decision of 18 December 2015, rejecting the tender submitted by the applicant under tender procedure 06B40/2015/M073 for the Mediterranean food concession in the Altiero Spinelli Building occupied by the Parliament in Brussels, and, second, of the ‘decision’ whereby the Parliament awarded that concession to another tenderer.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
2. |
The European Parliament shall pay the costs. |