Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2013.#Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).#Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE — Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.#Case T‑504/11.

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2013.
Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE — Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T‑504/11.

Judgment of the General Court (First Chamber) of 4 February 2013.
Paul Hartmann AG v Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs).
Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark DIGNITUDE — Earlier national and Community word marks Dignity — Relative ground for refusal — No likelihood of confusion — No similarity between the goods — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009.
Case T‑504/11.

European Court Reports 2013 -00000

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2013:57