Aspect
|
Countries
|
Number
|
Differences per country compared to 2020
|
Number of verifiers accredited by the National Accreditation Body of a Member States – for installations
|
23
|
106
|
AT(2), BE(2), BG(3), CZ(5), DE(16), DK(3), EE(1), EL(5), ES(6), FI(4), FR(6), HR(2), HU(5), IT(10), LV(3), NL(3), NO(3), PL(8), PT(3), RO(6), SE(4), SI(2), SK(4)
|
Number of verifiers accredited by the National Accreditation Body of a Member State- for aviation
|
12
|
23
|
AT(1), CZ(1), DE(4), EL(3), ES(2), FR(2), IT(3), LV(1), PT(2), RO(2), SI(1), SK(1)
|
Number of verifiers accredited by another Member State - for installations
|
24
|
57
|
AT(1), BE(4), BG(4), CY(2), CZ(1), DK(1), EE(3), ES(3), FR(1), HR(1), HU(3), IE(6), IS(2), LT(3), LU(4), MT(1), NL(2), NO(2), PL(3), PT(1), RO(2), SE(4), SK(1), XI(2)
|
Number of verifiers accredited by a national accreditation body in another Member State - for aviation
|
23
|
39
|
AT(2), BE(3), BG(1), CY(1), DK(1), EE(1), ES(1), FI(1), HR(1), HU(1), IE(2), IS(1), IT(3), LT(2), LU(2), MT(3), NL(2), NO(3), PL(3), PT(1), RO(1), SE(2), SK(1)
|
Number of complaints made about verifiers
|
6
|
28
|
DE(4), ES(16), FR(4), LV(1), RO(2), SE(1)
|
Number of resolved complaints
|
5
|
26
|
DE(4), ES(16), FR(3), RO(2), SE(1)
|
Number of complaints from prior reports, not reported as resolved earlier and meanwhile resolved
|
1
|
11
|
DE(11)
|
Number of non-conformities for verifiers reported in the information exchange
|
8
|
64
|
AT(10), BG(10), FI(18), FR(3), HR(10), HU(5), IE(3), NO(5)
|
Number of non-conformities above resolved
|
8
|
46
|
AT(10), BG(5), FI(9), FR(3), HR(10), HU(5), IE(3), NO(1)
|
Number of non-conformities from prior reports, not reported as resolved earlier and meanwhile resolved
|
3
|
24
|
BG(4), DE(11), FI(9)
|
Verifiers suspended
|
1
|
2
|
NO(2)
|
Withdrawal of accreditation certificate
|
1
|
1
|
FR(1)
|
Scope of accreditation reduced
|
6
|
7
|
DE(2), DK(1), FI(1), FR(1), NO(1), SE(1)
|
Aspect
|
Number of countries and list of relevant countries
|
Does a central competent authority review monitoring plans, annual emission reports and improvement reports in addition to local and regional authorities on a regular basis?
|
11
|
AT, BG, ES, HR, HU, LT, NL, PL, SE, SI, XI
|
Does a central competent authority steer local and/or regional competent authorities by giving binding instructions and guidance?
|
5
|
BG, FR, NL, SK, XI
|
Does a central competent authority steer local and/or regional competent authorities by giving non- binding instructions and guidance?
|
5
|
AT, FI, LT, PL, PT
|
Are regular meetings organised with the competent authorities?
|
9
|
BE, BG, EL, ES, FR, NL, PT, SE, XI
|
Is common training organised for all competent authorities to ensure harmonised implementation of requirements?
|
8
|
AT, BG, FR, NL, PT, SE, SK, XI
|
Is a structured working or coordination group established, where competent authority staff, discusses monitoring and reporting issues and develops common approaches?
|
10
|
BG, EL, ES, FR, HR, HU, NL, PT, SE, XI
|
Aspect
|
Number of countries and list of relevant countries (values in EUR)
|
Installations
|
Are fees charged to operators?
|
16
|
AT, BG, CZ, DK, ES, FI, HR, HU, IS, IT, NO, PL, PT, RO, SI, XI
|
|
Permit issuance/monitoring plan approval
|
14
|
BG(250), CZ(400), ES(985.35), FI(500), HR(5), HU(257), IS(3500), IT(250), NO(3356), PL(17.52), PT(207.96), RO(360), SI(22.6), XI(7729.2)
|
|
Permit update
|
13
|
BG(100), ES(393.33), FI(400), HR(5), HU(143), IS(780), IT(62), NO(1007), PL(2.13), PT(103.97), RO(360), SI(22.6), XI(546.92)
|
|
Permit transfer
|
8
|
FI(500), HR(5), HU(143), IS(780), IT(62), PL(2.13), SI(22.6), XI(546.92)
|
|
Permit surrender
|
3
|
IT(62), PL(2.13), XI(870.1)
|
|
New entrant reserve application
|
8
|
BG(500), HR(5), HU(652.5), IS(2600), IT(62), PT(1455.69), SI(22.6), XI(1447.53)
|
|
Annual subsistence charge amount
|
3
|
DK(4854), IT(250), XI(5277)
|
Aircraft operators
|
Are fees charged to aircraft operators?
|
13
|
AT, BG, DK, FI, HR, HU, IS, IT, NO, PL, PT, RO, SI
|
|
Approval of monitoring plan for emissions
|
11
|
BG(500), FI(700), HR(5), HU(540), IS(3100), IT(250), NO(3000), PL(2.13), PT(279.14), RO(2000), SI(22.6)
|
|
Approval of change to monitoring plan for emissions
|
11
|
BG(50), FI(250), HR(5), HU(540), IS(1080), IT(62), NO(800), PL(2.13), PT(139.57), RO(500), SI(22.6)
|
|
Approval of monitoring plan for tonne-kilometre data
|
8
|
BG(500), HU(540), IS(3100), IT(62), PL(2.13), PT(279.14), RO(2500), SI(22.6)
|
|
Approval of change to monitoring plan for tonne-kilometre data
|
8
|
BG(50), HU(540), IS(1080), IT(62), PL(2.13), PT(139.57), RO(500), SI(22.6)
|
|
Transfer of monitoring plan
|
5
|
HR(5), HU(540), IS(1080), IT(62), SI(22.6)
|
|
Surrender of monitoring plan
|
1
|
IT(62)
|
Type of check
|
Number of EU ETS countries (% or number per relevant country)
|
Installations
|
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency (%)
|
30
|
AT(100%), BE(100%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(100%), DE(100%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(100%), FI(100%), FR(100%), HR(100%), HU(100%), IE(90%), IS(100%), IT(100%), LT(100%), LU(100%), LV(100%), MT(100%), NL(100%), NO(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(100%), SI(100%), SK(100%), XI(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan (%)
|
29
|
AT(20%), BE(70%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(30%), DE(100%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(90%), FI(100%), FR(70%), HR(100%), HU(100%), IE(90%), IS(100%), LT(80%), LU(100%), LV(100%), MT(100%), NL(100%), NO(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(3%), SI(100%), SK(100%), XI(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with allocation data (%)
|
23
|
AT(20%), BE(100%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(10%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(43%), FI(100%), FR(100%), HU(100%), IE(1%), IS(100%), LT(80%), LU(100%), LV(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SI(100%), SK(100%), XI(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with other data (%).
|
21
|
AT(20%), BE(100%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(30%), DK(79%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(34%), FR(100%), HR(100%), LT(80%), LU(100%), NL(100%), NO(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(100%), SI(100%), SK(100%), XI(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports that were analysed in detail (%).
|
25
|
AT(20%), BE(11%), BG(8%), CY(100%), CZ(30%), DK(54%), EE(100%), EL(50%), ES(23%), FI(100%), FR(30%), HR(100%), IE(90%), IS(100%), LT(100%), LU(100%), MT(100%), NL(25%), NO(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(3%), SK(100%), XI(100%)
|
|
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of non-compliance
|
2
|
FR(1), RO(1)
|
|
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of other reasons.
|
5
|
ES(5), FR(4), LT(16), NO(3), PT(26)
|
Aircraft operators
|
Share of the emissions reports checked for completeness and internal consistency (%)
|
26
|
AT(100%), BE(50%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(100%), DE(100%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(100%), FI(100%), FR(100%), HR(100%), IE(100%), IS(100%), IT(100%), LT(100%), LU(100%), MT(100%), NL(100%), NO(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(100%), SK(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports checked for consistency with the monitoring plan (%)
|
24
|
AT(100%), BE(50%), BG(100%), CY(100%), CZ(50%), DE(100%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(100%), FI(100%), HR(100%), IS(100%), IT(60%), LT(100%), LU(100%), MT(100%), NL(14%), NO(100%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(100%), SK(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports that were cross-checked with other data (%)
|
23
|
AT(100%), BE(100%), BG(100%), CY(100%), DE(100%), DK(100%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(100%), FI(100%), FR(100%), HR(100%), IS(67%), IT(100%), LT(100%), LU(100%), MT(100%), NL(100%), NO(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(100%), SK(100%)
|
|
Share of the emissions reports that were analysed in detail (%).
|
23
|
AT(100%), BG(100%), CY(100%), DE(100%), DK(30%), EE(100%), EL(100%), ES(100%), FI(100%), FR(80%), HR(100%), IS(100%), IT(50%), LT(100%), LU(100%), MT(100%), NL(14%), NO(50%), PL(100%), PT(100%), RO(100%), SE(45%), SK(100%)
|
|
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of non-compliance
|
0
|
-
|
|
Number of verified emissions reports that were rejected because of other reasons.
|
1
|
PT(3)
|
Compliance measures
|
Countries
|
Installations
|
Onsite inspections
|
17
|
AT, BE, BG, CY, EL, ES, FR, HR, HU, IS, LT, NL, NO, PL, RO, SE, SI
|
|
Have preventive measures been taken to ensure operator’s compliance?
|
17
|
AT, BG, CZ, DE, DK, EE, ES, FI, FR, HR, HU, LU, NL, NO, PL, SE, SI
|
|
Ensuring that selling of emission allowances is prohibited in the case of irregularities
|
7
|
AT, BG, CZ, DE, FR, SI, SK
|
|
Imprisonment possible?
|
8
|
BE, CY, DK, EE, IE, LU, NO, SE
|
Aircraft operators
|
Onsite inspections
|
0
|
-
|
|
Have preventive measures been taken to ensure aircraft operator’s compliance?
|
4
|
AT, CZ, DE, RO
|
|
Ensuring that selling of emission allowances is prohibited in the case of irregularities
|
12
|
AT, CY, CZ, DE, EE, FI, HR, IS, LU, NO, RO, SE
|
|
Imprisonment possible?
|
6
|
CY, DK, IE, LU, NO, SE
|