1.

Is the obligation to pay interest for the period during which a State aid measure was unlawful, which flows, inter alia, from the judgment of the Court of Justice in CELF and Ministre de la Culture et de la Communication (C-199/06, ECLI:EU:C:2008:79), applicable in a situation such as that in the present proceedings, having regard to:

2.

In the event that there is in fact an obligation to pay interest in the circumstances set out in Question 1, can a situation such as that in the present case before the national court constitute such an exceptional situation which can provide grounds for a limit on the obligation of the aid recipient to pay interest?

3.

Is Article 9(2) of Regulation [No] 794/2004 (1) to be interpreted as meaning that the interest which is to be applied in accordance with Article 9(1) of the regulation, in the event that the Commission does not adopt a separate decision, is to be calculated by increasing the base rate established by the Commission by 100 basis points, even where the aid recipient has

4.

If the answer to the previous question is in the affirmative, is Article 108(3) TFEU to be interpreted as precluding a national provision which provides that the provisions on calculation of interest in Chapter V of Commission Regulation (EC) No 794/2004 of 21 April 2004 implementing Council Regulation (EU) 2015/1589 laying down detailed rules for the application of Article 108 TFEU are also to apply where the Commission has not adopted any decision in the case?