This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TB0085
Case T-85/24: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Münchner Wohnen v EUIPO – (Münchner Wohnen) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Münchner Wohnen – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-85/24: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Münchner Wohnen v EUIPO – (Münchner Wohnen) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Münchner Wohnen – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
Case T-85/24: Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Münchner Wohnen v EUIPO – (Münchner Wohnen) (EU trade mark – Application for EU word mark Münchner Wohnen – Absolute ground for refusal – Lack of distinctive character – Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 – Duty to state reasons – Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
OJ C, C/2025/2398, 28.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2398/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/2398 |
28.4.2025 |
Order of the General Court of 30 January 2025 – Münchner Wohnen v EUIPO – (Münchner Wohnen)
(Case T-85/24) (1)
(EU trade mark - Application for EU word mark Münchner Wohnen - Absolute ground for refusal - Lack of distinctive character - Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 - Duty to state reasons - Article 94(1) of Regulation 2017/1001 - Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law)
(C/2025/2398)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: Münchner Wohnen GmbH (Munich, Germany) (represented by: A. Kockläuner and O. Nilgen, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: A. Ringelhann, acting as Agent)
Re:
By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks partial annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 19 December 2023 (Case R 1288/2023-1).
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed. |
|
2. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2398/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)