Choose the experimental features you want to try

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62023TA1121

Case T-1121/23: Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Summerbird v EUIPO – Puratos (AMBER) (EU trade mark – Invalidity proceedings – EU word mark AMBER – Absolute ground for invalidity – Descriptive character – Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

OJ C, C/2025/2377, 28.4.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2377/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2377/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

C series


C/2025/2377

28.4.2025

Judgment of the General Court of 5 March 2025 – Summerbird v EUIPO – Puratos (AMBER)

(Case T-1121/23)  (1)

(EU trade mark - Invalidity proceedings - EU word mark AMBER - Absolute ground for invalidity - Descriptive character - Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001)

(C/2025/2377)

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Summerbird A/S (Assens, Denmark) (represented by: T. Kruse Lie and A.-S. Kjeldbjerg Hilligsøe, lawyers)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: T. Klee, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO, intervener before the General Court: Puratos (Dilbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Debaene and H. Haouideg, lawyers)

Re:

By its action under Article 263 TFEU, the applicant seeks the annulment of the decision of the First Board of Appeal of the European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO) of 28 September 2023 (Case R 1816/2022-1).

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Summerbird A/S to pay the costs.


(1)   OJ C C/2024/965, 29.1.2024.


ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/2377/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)


Top