Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document C:2014:129:TOC

Official Journal of the European Union, C 129, 28 April 2014


Display all documents published in this Official Journal
 

ISSN 1977-091X

Official Journal

of the European Union

C 129

European flag  

English edition

Information and Notices

Volume 57
28 April 2014


Notice No

Contents

page

 

IV   Notices

 

NOTICES FROM EUROPEAN UNION INSTITUTIONS, BODIES, OFFICES AND AGENCIES

 

Court of Justice of the European Union

2014/C 129/01

Last publication of the Court of Justice of the European Union in the Official Journal of the European UnionOJ C 112, 14.4.2014

1


 

V   Announcements

 

COURT PROCEEDINGS

 

Court of Justice

2014/C 129/02

Joined Cases C-337/12 P to C-340/12 P: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2014 — Pi-Design AG, Bodum France SAS, Bodum Logistics A/S v Yoshida Metal Industry Co. Ltd, Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (Appeal — Community trade mark — Registration of signs consisting of a surface with black dots — Declaration of invalidity — Regulation (EC) No 40/94 — Article 7(1)(e)(ii) — Distortion of the evidence)

2

2014/C 129/03

Case C-409/12: Judgment of the Court (Third Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Patent- und Markensenat (Austria)) — Backaldrin Österreich The Kornspitz Company GmbH v Pfahnl Backmittel GmbH (Trade marks — Directive 2008/95/EC — Article 12(2)(a) — Revocation — Trade mark which, in consequence of acts or inactivity of the proprietor, has become the common name in the trade for a product or service in respect of which it is registered — Perception of the word sign ‘KORNSPITZ’ by sellers, on the one hand, and by end users, on the other — Loss of distinctive character from the point of view of end users only)

3

2014/C 129/04

Case C-458/12: Judgment of the Court (Ninth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale di Trento (Italy)) — Lorenzo Amatori and Others v Telecom Italia SpA, Telecom Italia Information Technology Srl (Request for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Transfer of undertakings — Safeguarding of employees’ rights — Directive 2001/23/EC — Transfer of employment relationships in the event of a legal transfer of part of a business that cannot be identified as a pre-existing autonomous economic entity)

4

2014/C 129/05

Case C-595/12: Judgment of the Court (First Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale Amministrativo Regionale per il Lazio (Italy)) — Loredana Napoli v Ministero della Giustizia — Dipartimento dell’Amministrazione penitenziaria (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Social policy — Directive 2006/54/EC — Equal treatment of men and women in matters of employment and occupation — Training course for acquiring the status of a public official — Exclusion on grounds of a prolonged absence — Absence attributable to maternity leave)

5

2014/C 129/06

Joined Cases C-606/12 and C-607/12: Judgment of the Court (Seventh Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (requests for a preliminary ruling from the Commissione tributaria provinciale Genova (Italy)) — DresserRand SA v Agenzia delle Entrate Direzione Provinciale Ufficio Controlli (Request for a preliminary ruling — Taxation — VAT — Directive 2006/112/EC — Article 17(2)(f) — Condition relating to the return of goods to the Member State from which they were initially dispatched or transported)

5

2014/C 129/07

Case C-206/13: Judgment of the Court (Tenth Chamber) of 6 March 2014 (request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunale amministrativo regionale per la Sicilia (Italy)) — Cruciano Siragusa v Regione Sicilia — Soprintendenza Beni Culturali e Ambientali di Palermo (Reference for a preliminary ruling — Charter of Fundamental Rights of the European Union — General principles of EU law — Implementation of EU law — Scope of EU law — A sufficient connection — Lack of such a connection — Lack of jurisdiction of the Court)

6

2014/C 129/08

Case C-650/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal d’instance de Bordeaux (France) lodged on 9 December 2013 — Thierry Delvigne v Commune de Lesparre Médoc and Préfet de la Gironde

7

2014/C 129/09

Case C-661/13: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberlandesgericht Düsseldorf (Germany) lodged on 13 December 2013 — Astellas Pharma Inc. v Polpharma SA Pharmaceutical Works

7

2014/C 129/10

Case C-6/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Oberster Gerichtshof (Austria) lodged on 9 January 2014 — Wucher Helicopter GmbH, Euro-Aviation Versicherungs AG v Fridolin Santer

8

2014/C 129/11

Case C-10/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 13 January 2014 — J.B.G.T. Miljoen; Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

9

2014/C 129/12

Case C-14/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 15 January 2014 — X; Other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

9

2014/C 129/13

Case C-17/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 16 January 2014 — Société Générale SA; other party: Staatssecretaris van Financiën

10

2014/C 129/14

Case C-20/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundespatentgericht (Germany) lodged on 17 January 2014 — BGW Marketing- & Management-Service GmbH v Bodo Scholz

11

2014/C 129/15

Case C-62/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Bundesverfassungsgericht (Germany) lodged on 10 February 2014 — Peter Gauweiler and Others

11

2014/C 129/16

Case C-65/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Tribunal du Travail de Nivelles (Belgium) lodged on 10 February 2014 — Charlotte Rosselle v Institut national d’assurance maladie-invalidité (INAMI), Union nationale des mutualités libres (UNM Libres)

13

2014/C 129/17

Case C-84/14 P: Appeal brought on 18 February 2014 by Forgital Italy SpA against the order of the General Court (Sixth Chamber) delivered on 4 December 2013 in Case T-438/10 Forgital Italy SpA v Council of the European Union

14

2014/C 129/18

Case C-100/14 P: Appeal brought on 28 February 2014 by the European Medical Association Asbl (EMA) against the judgment of the General Court (Second Chamber) delivered on 11 December 2013 in Case T-116/11 European Medical Association v European Commission

14

2014/C 129/19

Case C-113/14: Action brought on 10 March 2014 — Federal Republic of Germany v European Parliament, Council of the European Union

15

 

General Court

2014/C 129/20

Case T-592/10: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — El Corte Inglés v OHIM — Technisynthese (BTS) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for the Community word mark BTS — Earlier Community and national figurative marks TBS — Relative ground for refusal — Likelihood of confusion — Similarity of the signs — Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2014/C 129/21

Joined Cases T-102/11 and T-369/12 to T-371/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — American Express Marketing & Development v OHIM (IP ZONE) (Community trade mark — Applications for Community word marks IP ZONE, EUROPE IP ZONE, IP ZONE EUROPE and EUROPEAN IP ZONE — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009)

17

2014/C 129/22

Case T-202/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Al Assad v Council (Common foreign and security policy — Restrictive measures taken against Syria — Freezing of funds — Entry of an individual on the lists of persons subject to restrictive measures — Personal ties to members of the regime — Rights of the defence — Fair hearing — Obligation to state reasons — Burden of proof — Right to effective judicial protection — Proportionality — Right to property — Right to privacy)

18

2014/C 129/23

Case T-315/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Tubes Radiatori v OHIM — Antrax It (Radiator) (Community design — Invalidity proceedings — Registered Community design representing a radiator for heating — Earlier design — Ground for invalidity — Lack of individual character — Overall impression not different — Article 6 and Article 25(1)(b) of Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 — No scope for innovation — Obligation to state reasons)

19

2014/C 129/24

Case T-348/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Globosat Programadora v OHIM — Sport TV Portugal (SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL — Earlier national figurative mark SPORTV — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

19

2014/C 129/25

Case T-381/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Borrajo Canelo and Others v OHIM (Community trade mark — Proceedings for revocation — Community word mark PALMA MULATA — Genuine use — Article 15(1)(a) and Article 51(1)(a) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Form differing in elements which do not alter the distinctiveness)

20

2014/C 129/26

Case T-430/12: Judgment of the General Court of 13 March 2014 — Heinrich v OHIM — Commission (European Network Rapid Manufacturing) (Community trade mark — Invalidity proceedings — Community figurative mark European Network Rapid Manufacturing — Absolute ground for refusal — Imitation of the emblem of an international intergovernmental organisation — Article 7(1)(h) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Article 6b of the Paris Convention)

20

2014/C 129/27

Case T-373/13: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Alsteens v Commission (Appeal — Civil Service — Temporary agents — Extension of contract — Manifest inadmissibility of the action at first instance — Right to a hearing — Severability of the codicil extending the contract)

21

2014/C 129/28

Case T-41/14: Action brought on 15 January 2014 — Argo Development and Manufacturing v OHIM — Clapbanner (Advertising articles)

22

2014/C 129/29

Case T-43/14: Action brought on 13 January 2014 — Heidrick & Struggles International v OHIM (THE LEADERSHIP COMPANY)

22

2014/C 129/30

Case T-53/14: Action brought on 20 January 2014 — Ludwig-Bölkow-Systemtechnik v Commission

23

2014/C 129/31

Case T-59/14: Action brought on 23 January 2014 — Blackrock v OHIM (INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD)

24

2014/C 129/32

Case T-58/14: Action brought on 27 January 2014 — Stührk Delikatessen Import v Commission

25

2014/C 129/33

Case T-59/14: Action brought on 23 January 2014 — Blackrock v OHIM (INVESTING FOR A NEW WORLD)

26

2014/C 129/34

Case T-61/14: Action brought on 28 January 2014 — Monster Energy v OHIM — Balaguer (icexpresso + energy coffee)

26

2014/C 129/35

Case T-68/14: Action brought on 29 January 2014 — Post Bank Iran v Council

27

2014/C 129/36

Case T-71/14: Action brought on 30 January 2014 — Swatch v OHIM — Panavision Europe (SWATCHBALL)

29

2014/C 129/37

Case T-87/14: Action brought on 7 February 2014 — Islamic Republic of Iran Shipping Lines and Others v Council

30

2014/C 129/38

Case T-97/14: Action brought on 13 February 2014 — Harry’s New York Bar v OHIM — Harrys Pubar (HARRY’S NEW YORK BAR)

31

2014/C 129/39

Case T-107/14: Action brought on 14 February 2014 — Hellenic Republic v Commission

31

2014/C 129/40

Case T-116/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — Bunge Argentina v Council

33

2014/C 129/41

Case T-123/14: Action brought on 17 February 2014 — BSH Bosch und Siemens Hausgeräte v OHIM — Arçelik (AquaPerfect)

34

2014/C 129/42

Case T-145/14: Action brought on 3 March 2014 — adidas v OHIM — Shoe Branding Europe (Device of two parallel stripes)

35

 

European Union Civil Service Tribunal

2014/C 129/43

Case F-128/12: Judgment of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 12 March 2014 — CR v Parliament (Civil service — Remuneration — Family allowances — Dependent child allowance — Recovery of overpayments — Intention to mislead the administration — Evidence — Not possible to rely against the administration upon the five year time-limit for bringing the application for recovery of the overpayments — Plea of illegality — Pre-litigation procedure — Requirement of consistency between the complaint and the action — Plea of illegality raised for the first time in the action — Admissibility)

36

2014/C 129/44

Case F-77/13: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (3rd Chamber) of 5 March 2014 — DC v Europol (Civil service — Europol staff — Invalidity — Invalidity allowance — Calculation of interest — Application for damages — Manifest inadmissibility)

36

2014/C 129/45

Case F-119/13: Action brought on 11 December 2013 — ZZ v Commission

37

2014/C 129/46

Case F-125/13: Action brought on 20 December 2013 — ZZ v OHIM

37


 

Corrigenda

2014/C 129/47

Corrigendum to the notice in the Official Journal in Case T-689/13 (Official Journal of the European Union C 85 of 22 March 2014, p. 21)

39


EN

 

Top