This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62024TN0539
Case T-539/24: Action brought on 17 October 2024 – Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Commission
Case T-539/24: Action brought on 17 October 2024 – Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Commission
Case T-539/24: Action brought on 17 October 2024 – Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Commission
OJ C, C/2025/193, 13.1.2025, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/193/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
Official Journal |
EN C series |
|
C/2025/193 |
13.1.2025 |
Action brought on 17 October 2024 – Ryanair Designated Activity Company v Commission
(Case T-539/24)
(C/2025/193)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Ryanair Designated Activity Company (Dublin, Ireland) (represented by: F.-C. Laprévote, E. Vahida, S. Rating, D. Pérez de Lamo and C. Cozzani, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the European Commission’s decision (EU) of 26 March 2024 on State Aid SA.59029 (2020/NN) – Italy – COVID-19 Compensation scheme for airlines with an Italian operating license (1); |
|
— |
order the European Commission to pay the costs; and, |
|
— |
order any interveners to pay their costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
In support of the action, the applicant relies on five pleas in law.
|
1. |
First plea in law, alleging that the decision infringes the freedom to provide services (Articles 15 of Regulation 1008/2008 (2) and 56 TFUE) and the freedom of establishment (Article 49 TFEU). |
|
2. |
Second plea in law, alleging that the decision infringes Articles 8(1), 8(2) and 8(4) of the Rome I Regulation. |
|
3. |
Third plea in law, alleging that the decision infringes Article 107(2)(b) TFEU insofar it manifestly errs in the assessment of (i) the direct causal link between the COVID-19 pandemic and the eligible damage and (ii) the proportionality of the aid measure. |
|
4. |
Fourth plea in law, alleging that the Commission failed to initiate a formal investigation procedure despite serious difficulties and violated the applicant’s procedural rights. |
|
5. |
Fifth plea in law, alleging that the Commission infringed its duty to state reasons pursuant to Article 296(2) TFUE. |
(1) OJ C/2024/4673.
(2) Regulation (EC) No 1008/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 24 September 2008 on common rules for the operation of air services in the Community (OJ 2008, L 293, p. 3).
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2025/193/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)