This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C/2024/06485
NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION — EPSO/AD/413/24 — Scientific research administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics, 2. Energy science and sustainability, 3. ICT and (cyber)security, 4. Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making, 5. Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems, 6. Space applications and geo-information technologies, 7. Health and consumer protection, 8. Transport science and sustainable mobility, 9. Social, economic, and political sciences, 10. Behavioural science, economics, and education
NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION — EPSO/AD/413/24 — Scientific research administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics, 2. Energy science and sustainability, 3. ICT and (cyber)security, 4. Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making, 5. Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems, 6. Space applications and geo-information technologies, 7. Health and consumer protection, 8. Transport science and sustainable mobility, 9. Social, economic, and political sciences, 10. Behavioural science, economics, and education
NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION — EPSO/AD/413/24 — Scientific research administrators (AD 7) in the following fields: 1. Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics, 2. Energy science and sustainability, 3. ICT and (cyber)security, 4. Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making, 5. Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems, 6. Space applications and geo-information technologies, 7. Health and consumer protection, 8. Transport science and sustainable mobility, 9. Social, economic, and political sciences, 10. Behavioural science, economics, and education
OJ C, C/2024/6485, 5.11.2024, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6485/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Official Journal |
EN C series |
C/2024/6485 |
5.11.2024 |
NOTICE OF OPEN COMPETITION
EPSO/AD/413/24 — Scientific research administrators (AD 7) in the following fields:
1. Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics
2. Energy science and sustainability
3. ICT and (cyber)security
4. Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making
5. Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems
6. Space applications and geo-information technologies
7. Health and consumer protection
8. Transport science and sustainable mobility
9. Social, economic, and political sciences
10. Behavioural science, economics, and education
Deadline for application: 10 December 2024 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time
(C/2024/6485)
CONTENTS
1. |
GENERAL PROVISIONS | 2 |
2. |
WHAT DUTIES CAN I EXPECT TO PERFORM? | 2 |
3. |
AM I ELIGIBLE? | 2 |
3.1. |
General eligibility conditions | 2 |
3.2. |
Specific eligibility conditions — languages | 3 |
3.3. |
Specific eligibility conditions — education, experience, publications | 3 |
4. |
HOW WILL THE COMPETITION BE ORGANISED? | 3 |
4.1. |
Overview of the competition phases | 3 |
4.2. |
Languages used in this competition | 3 |
4.3. |
Competition phases | 4 |
4.3.1. |
Application | 4 |
4.3.2. |
Testing | 4 |
4.3.3. |
Initial eligibility check | 5 |
4.3.4. |
Test scoring and final eligibility check | 6 |
4.3.5. |
Establishment of the reserve lists | 7 |
5. |
EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS | 7 |
ANNEX I. |
General rules | 8 |
ANNEX II. |
Typical duties | 15 |
ANNEX III. |
Specific eligibility conditions — education, experience, publications | 18 |
ANNEX IV. |
Examples of minimum qualifications | 33 |
1. GENERAL PROVISIONS
(a) |
The European Personnel Selection Office (EPSO) is organising an open competition, based on qualifications and tests, to draw up lists from which the institutions, bodies and agencies of the European Union (EU), mainly the European Commission’s Joint Research Centre (JRC), may recruit new members of the civil service as ‘administrators’ (grade AD 7). |
(b) |
Most posts will be in various JRC sites (Geel, Belgium; Karlsruhe, Germany; Seville, Spain; Ispra, Italy; and Petten, The Netherlands). |
(c) |
This notice of competition and its annexes, including Annex I ‘General rules’, form the legally binding framework for this competition. |
(d) |
EPSO endeavours to use gender-neutral and inclusive language. Any reference to a person of a specific gender must be deemed also to constitute a reference to a person of any other gender. |
(e) |
This notice of competition covers ten fields. A candidate may only apply for one of them. Candidates must make their choice when they apply and will not be able to change it after they have validated their application form. |
(f) |
Numbers of successful candidates sought are indicated in Table 1. Table 1
|
2. WHAT DUTIES CAN I EXPECT TO PERFORM?
Please see Annex II for information about the typical duties that the successful candidates can expect to perform.
3. AM I ELIGIBLE?
Candidates must meet all the general and specific eligibility conditions (see Sections 3.1 – 3.3) on the closing date for applications.
3.1. General eligibility conditions
A candidate must:
(1) |
be a national of one of the Member States of the EU and enjoy full rights as a citizen, |
(2) |
have fulfilled any obligations imposed on them by the laws concerning military service, |
(3) |
meet the character requirements for the duties concerned. |
3.2. Specific eligibility conditions — languages
A candidate must have knowledge of at least two of the 24 official EU languages, as provided for in Section 4.2.
3.3. Specific eligibility conditions — education, experience, publications
The specific eligibility conditions for each field are listed in Annex III. Please also see Annex IV for examples of minimum qualifications.
4. HOW WILL THE COMPETITION BE ORGANISED?
4.1. Overview of the competition phases
This competition will be organised in the following phases:
— |
Application (see Section 4.3.1). |
— |
Testing: reasoning tests, a field-related short-text questionnaire (FRSTQ test), and a written test (see Section 4.3.2). |
— |
Initial eligibility check (see Section 4.3.3). |
— |
Test scoring and final eligibility check (see Section 4.3.4). |
— |
Establishment of the reserve lists (see Section 4.3.5). |
4.2. Languages used in this competition
(a) |
The Staff Regulations (1) stipulate that an official may only be appointed on condition that they produce evidence of a thorough knowledge of one of the languages of the EU and a satisfactory knowledge of another language of the EU to the extent necessary for the performance of their duties. |
(b) |
Therefore, in this competition, a candidate must have a thorough knowledge (minimum C1 level) of at least one of the 24 official EU languages and a satisfactory knowledge (minimum B2 level) of a different language to be chosen among the remaining 23 official EU languages. The minimum levels indicated here apply to each linguistic ability (speaking, writing, reading, and listening) requested in the application form. These abilities reflect those of the Common European Framework of Reference for Languages (2). |
(c) |
For ease of reference, those languages will be referred to as ‘language 1’ and ‘language 2’. |
(d) |
The languages will be used in different phases of the competition as indicated in Table 2. |
Table 2
Competition phase |
Tests |
Language |
Application |
— |
Any of the 24 official EU languages |
Testing |
Reasoning tests |
Language 1 |
FRSTQ test |
Language 2 |
|
Written test |
Language 2 |
(e) |
Candidates will have to indicate their choice of test languages in their application form and will not be able to change it after validating their application. |
4.3. Competition phases
4.3.1. Application
(a) |
To apply, a candidate needs to have an EPSO account. Candidates who do not yet have an EPSO account, will need to create one. Only one account may be created for all the EPSO applications of a given candidate. |
(b) |
The candidates must apply online on the EPSO website (3) and validate their applications by 10 December 2024 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time. |
(c) |
By validating their application form, candidates declare that they meet all the conditions mentioned under Section 3 ‘Am I eligible?’ and in Annex III to this notice. Once the candidates have validated their application form, they will no longer be able to make any changes. It is the candidates’ responsibility to ensure that they complete and validate their application within the deadline. |
(d) |
By 18 February 2025 at 12.00 (midday), Brussels time, candidates will have to upload the scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form to their EPSO account and link them to their application. An explanation on how to do this is available on the EPSO website (4). |
4.3.2. Testing
(a)
(i) |
All candidates who have validated their application form by the deadline indicated in point 4.3.1(b) will be invited to sit a series of tests defined below. |
(ii) |
The tests will be held and proctored (invigilated) remotely. EPSO will inform candidates about the testing modalities at the latest when inviting them to the tests. |
(b)
(i) |
The reasoning tests are multiple-choice tests assessing the candidates’ verbal, numerical, and abstract reasoning skills. They will be organised as indicated in Table 3. Table 3
|
(ii) |
A candidate needs to obtain at least
|
(c)
(i) |
The FRSTQ test will consist of a short-text questionnaire aimed at assessing relevant competencies necessary for performing activities in areas listed in Annex III:
|
(ii) |
Candidates are encouraged to use examples from prior professional experience when answering FRSTQ test questions. |
(iii) |
The test will be organised as indicated in Table 4. Table 4
|
(iv) |
Each answer to a question will be scored on a scale from 0 to 4. There is no pass score in this test. The score obtained will be used as defined in Section 4.3.4. |
(d)
(i) |
The written test is aimed at assessing a candidate’s written communication skills. It will be organised as indicated in Table 5. Table 5
|
(ii) |
Candidates will be required to respond to the test assignment(s) based on the documentation related to the area of research. The documentation will be made available on the EPSO website ahead of the test date. Candidates will receive the same documentation during the test, along with the assignment(s) based on it. |
(iii) |
The written test is not a language test. The assessment will be based on the specific anchors published on EPSO’s website (5). |
4.3.3. Initial eligibility check
(a) |
Parallel to the testing phase, the Selection Board will verify whether the candidates invited for testing satisfy the eligibility criterion referred to in point 1(b) of Annex III to this notice. |
(b) |
Only the candidates meeting this criterion will proceed to the next phase of the competition and have their tests scored. |
(c) |
The results of the initial eligibility check will be notified to candidates at the end of the competition (see point 4.3.5(f)). |
4.3.4. Test scoring and final eligibility check
(a)
(i) |
The test scores will be used as indicated in Table 6. Table 6
|
(ii) |
Should a candidate fail to obtain at least the required pass score(s) in one of the tests, their participation in the competition will come to an end. Such candidates will not have their test answers and/or scripts processed any further and will not have their eligibility further checked. |
(iii) |
Test results will only be notified to candidates at the end of the competition (see point 4.3.5(f)), irrespective of the step in the competition the candidate reached. |
(b)
(i) |
The reasoning tests will be scored first. Scoring will be carried out only for those candidates who were found to meet the requirements of the initial eligibility check (see Section 4.3.3). |
(ii) |
Candidates who obtained at least the required pass scores in the reasoning tests will have the FRSTQ test scored. |
(iii) |
Subsequently, candidates will be ranked, within each field, in the descending order of their FRSTQ scores. This ranking will be used to determine the candidates who will have the written test script scored and their eligibility checked in accordance with point 4.3.4(c). |
(c)
(i) |
Scoring of the written test and the final eligibility check (the latter conducted in accordance with point 4.3.4(c)(ii)) will be carried out in parallel. This will be performed for each field, in the descending order of the ranking referred to in point 4.3.4(b)(iii). The Selection Board will only score the scripts of the written test and check the eligibility of a limited number of candidates (not more than 1,5 times the number of successful candidates sought per field). |
(ii) |
The final eligibility check involves verifying compliance with the eligibility conditions set out in Section 3 ‘Am I eligible?’ and in Annex III to this notice. The Selection Board will take the final decision on a candidate’s eligibility by comparing (a) the declarations made in the application form and (b) the documents duly provided by the candidates in accordance with this notice and with Section 2.3, points (1)-(3), of the General rules to support those declarations, and by conducting other checks it deems necessary. |
(iii) |
Should a candidate not be amongst those who scored the highest as defined in point 4.3.4(c)(i), their participation in the competition will come to an end. Such candidates will not have their written test scripts processed and will not have their eligibility checked further. |
4.3.5. Establishment of the reserve lists
(a) |
Once the procedures referred to in point 4.3.4(c) have been completed, candidates who have obtained at least the required pass score in the written test and have been found eligible will have their combined overall scores established as indicated in Table 6. |
(b) |
Candidates will then be ranked, per field, in the descending order of their combined overall scores. This final ranking will serve as the basis for the establishment of the reserve lists. |
(c) |
The Selection Board will include in the reserve lists the names of the candidates who (i) have obtained at least all the required pass scores and one of the highest combined overall scores from amongst the candidates referred to in point 4.3.4(c)(i), and (ii) were found to be eligible. This will be performed in the descending order of the final ranking until the number of successful candidates sought per field is reached or until the pool of candidates meeting the criteria mentioned in this point is depleted. |
(d) |
All candidates who tie for the last available place in a reserve list will be added to that reserve list. |
(e) |
Names in the reserve lists will be listed alphabetically. The reserve lists will be made available to the recruiting services. |
(f) |
The candidates will be notified of their results (test results and eligibility-check results) unless their test answers and/or scripts have not been processed and/or eligibility has not been checked for the reasons indicated in this notice. |
(g) |
Inclusion on a reserve list does not confer any right to or guarantee of recruitment. |
5. EQUAL OPPORTUNITIES AND REASONABLE ACCOMMODATIONS
(a) |
EPSO endeavours to apply an equal opportunities policy to all candidates. |
(b) |
Candidates who have a disability or a medical condition that may affect their ability to take the tests, should indicate this in their application form and follow the procedure to request reasonable accommodations as described on the EPSO website (6). Having examined the candidates’ request as well as the relevant supporting documents, EPSO may grant reasonable accommodations where deemed necessary. |
(1) Regulation No 31 (EEC), 11 (EAEC), laying down the Staff Regulations of Officials and the Conditions of Employment of Other Servants of the European Economic Community and the European Atomic Energy Community (OJ 45, 14.6.1962, p. 1385/62). Consolidated text: https://eur-lex.europa.eu/legal-content/EN/TXT/?uri=CELEX%3A01962R0031-20240101.
(2) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/documents/common-european-framework-reference-languages.
(3) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/job-opportunities/open-for-application.
(4) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/help/faq/eligibility.
(5) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/help/faq/14952.
(6) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/how-request-specific-adjustments-selection-tests.
ANNEX I
GENERAL RULES
1. Basic provisions
(1) |
The provisions of these general rules apply unless the notice of competition states otherwise. |
(2) |
Candidates receive time-sensitive information in their EPSO accounts. They should check their EPSO account at least every 3 calendar days to keep track of their progress during the competition and to avoid missing a deadline.
If a candidate cannot check their EPSO account due to a technical problem on the part of EPSO, they must notify EPSO immediately via the online contact form (1). |
(3) |
Where several candidates tie for the last available place at any phase of the competition, they will all go on to the next phase of the competition. Where several candidates tie for the last available place on the reserve list, they will all be included on the reserve list. |
(4) |
Any candidates readmitted following a successful request, complaint, or appeal will either (a) re-enter the competition at the phase from which they had been excluded or (b) be added to the reserve list, as applicable. |
(5) |
When EPSO addresses a candidate via the EPSO account or by email, it will do so in one of the languages that the candidate has declared to have knowledge of at level B2 or higher (2) in the ‘Ability to read’ section of the application form. |
(6) |
Candidates can contact EPSO via the online contact form available on the EPSO website (3). Before contacting EPSO, candidates are invited to consult the ‘frequently asked questions’ section on the EPSO website (4). |
(7) |
EPSO reserves the right to cease any improper (i.e. repetitive, abusive and/or irrelevant) correspondence. |
2. Qualifications, experience, supporting documents
The start and end of periods of education or experience should always be indicated in dd/mm/yyyy format.
2.1. Educational qualifications
(1) |
Degrees, diplomas and/or certificates, whether issued in Member States or non-EU countries, must be recognised by a competent authority of a Member State. |
(2) |
The differences between national education systems, in particular the differences between the titles given to degrees, diplomas and certificates, will be taken into account when assessing whether candidates have the qualifications required by the notice of competition. |
(3) |
For any educational qualification, candidates should indicate the title, level of education, subjects covered, start and end dates of the studies, and the regular/official study duration. |
(4) |
In the ‘Education’ tab of the application form, candidates should also include their secondary education qualification. |
2.2. Professional experience
(1) |
To be taken into account, professional experience must meet the following general conditions:
|
(2) |
Professional experience, as listed below, will also be considered in the light of specific rules, including certain exemptions from the requirements referred to in paragraph (1) above:
|
2.3. Supporting documents
(1) |
Candidates will have to upload – to their EPSO account – scanned copies of the documents supporting the declarations made in their application form. They will have to do so by the date established in the notice of competition or – if no date is set by the notice – by the date indicated by EPSO. |
(2) |
Failure to provide supporting document(s) by the date mentioned above may result in a candidate being considered ineligible or in their specific qualifications or experience not being taken into account. |
(3) |
At any phase of the procedure, candidates may be requested (typically, via an email) to provide additional information or documents. |
(4) |
Among other documents, candidates will have to upload a copy of their identity card or passport which must be valid on the closing date for the applications. When requested, candidates will have to present an original of their identity card or a passport. |
(5) |
As a proof of their educational qualifications and training, candidates will have to provide:
|
(6) |
All periods of professional activity must be covered by originals or certified copies of the following documents:
|
3. The role of the Selection Board
(1) |
The Selection Board of the competition decides on the difficulty of the competition tests and approves their content, assesses the candidates’ compliance with the specific eligibility conditions, compares candidates’ merits, and selects the best candidates in the light of the requirements set out in the notice of competition. |
(2) |
The proceedings of the Selection Board are secret. |
(3) |
The work of the Selection Board is facilitated by EPSO. |
4. Conflict of interest
(1) |
The names of the Board members are published on the EPSO website (5). |
(2) |
Candidates, Selection Board members, and EPSO staff members facilitating the organisation of a specific competition are required to declare any conflict of interest that might arise, in particular, in cases of a family or direct working relationship. A situation that might constitute a conflict of interest must be declared to EPSO as soon as the person concerned becomes aware of it. EPSO will evaluate each case individually and take appropriate measures. |
(3) |
To ensure the Selection Board’s independence, except in expressly authorised cases, it is strictly forbidden for candidates or anyone outside the Board to attempt to contact any of its members on any matter related to the competition or the Board’s proceedings. |
(4) |
Candidates who wish to state their case to the Selection Board must do so in writing, submitting this correspondence via EPSO (6). |
(5) |
A breach of any of the rules mentioned above could result in disciplinary action against a Selection Board member or EPSO staff member and/or in disqualification of a candidate from the competition (see Section 6). |
5. Testing
(1) |
EPSO will inform candidates on the testing modalities as well as any necessary details and instructions at the latest when inviting the candidates to the tests. |
(2) |
If and when instructed, candidates must book a test appointment following the instructions received from EPSO. The booking and testing periods are limited. |
(3) |
Candidates must complete all the necessary steps referred to in the instructions issued prior to the tests, such as installing software, performing the required synchronisation(s), undergoing a connectivity trial, technical prerequisites’ test, or a systems’ check and/or taking a mock test. Compliance with instructions will allow to check the readiness of the candidate’s IT environment and the compatibility of the candidate’s device with the testing platform or application. Failure to complete the mandatory steps may prevent the candidate from taking the tests and will impede the ability of the test delivery provider to address effectively any technical issues encountered by the candidate during testing. |
(4) |
In cases where candidates fail to book, sit or complete one or more of the tests, it will be considered that their participation in the competition has come to an end, unless the candidates can prove that the failure to book, sit or complete a test was due to circumstances beyond the candidates’ control or due to a situation of force majeure. They should contact EPSO as soon as possible, preferably before the test, and must provide the necessary justification, including, where applicable, proof that they contacted the technical support services. |
(5) |
Failure to comply with the terms and conditions applicable in relation to testing, specified in the instructions and information made available to candidates, will not be considered as a circumstance beyond the candidates’ control or a situation of force majeure. |
(6) |
Candidates are also invited to consult EPSO's website (7) to become more familiar with EPSO’s selection procedures, including general requirements applicable to testing. |
6. Disqualification from the competition
(1) |
Candidates may be disqualified at any stage of the competition on the following grounds:
|
(2) |
Candidates for recruitment by the EU institutions are expected to act with the highest possible integrity, in accordance with Article 27, first paragraph, and Article 28(c) of the Staff Regulations. In case of fraud or attempted fraud, EPSO may decide to declare a candidate ineligible for future competitions for a limited period of time. |
7. Concerns and remedies
7.1. Technical and organisational issues
(1) |
If at any phase of the selection procedure candidates encounter a serious technical or organisational problem, they should inform EPSO via the online contact form (8). |
(2) |
For issues with the application form, candidates must contact EPSO immediately and in any case before the deadline for applications. |
(3) |
If the problem occurs during testing, a candidate must do both of the following:
|
(4) |
Complaints received after the deadline specified in this point will be considered inadmissible. |
(5) |
Complaints about technical issues, submitted by candidates who failed to undertake the steps referred to in Section 5(3) will be considered inadmissible unless the candidate can prove that the failure to complete the necessary steps was due to circumstances beyond the candidates’ control or due to a situation of force majeure. |
(6) |
Claims made in the context of complaints referred to in Sections 7.2.2 and 7.3.1 and based on alleged technical and/or organisational issues that had not been reported in accordance with Section 7.1 read together with Section 5, will be considered inadmissible. |
7.2. Internal review procedures
7.2.1. Complaints about MCQ test questions
(1) |
Candidates who consider that they have justifiable reasons to believe that an error in one or more of the questions in the multiple-choice-question (MCQ) test affected their ability to answer, may ask for the question(s) concerned to be reviewed. |
(2) |
The Selection Board may decide to ‘neutralise’ the question(s) containing the error: cancel the question(s) concerned and redistribute the points initially allocated to that/those question(s) among the remaining questions of the test. Only those candidates who received the question(s) concerned will be affected by the recalculation. The scoring of the tests remains as indicated in the relevant sections of the notice of competition. |
(3) |
To introduce a complaint about MCQ test question(s), a candidate should:
|
(4) |
Complaints submitted after the deadline or complaints which do not clearly describe the contested question(s) and/or alleged error(s) will not be taken into account. In particular, complaints merely pointing out alleged issues of translation, without specifying the problem, will not be taken into account. |
(5) |
Claims made in the context of complaints referred to in Section 7.3.1 and based on alleged issues in MCQ test questions that had not been reported in accordance with Section 7.2.1, will be rejected. |
7.2.2. Requests for review
(1) |
Candidates can request a review of a decision taken by the Selection Board, which establishes their results, determines whether they can proceed to the next phase of the competition, or affects their legal status as a candidate in another way. |
(2) |
The purpose of the review procedure is to allow the Selection Board to amend the contested decision in cases where there is a reason to do so (such as a mistake in the assessment). In the review procedure, the Selection Board will review its assessment of the candidate’s merits and will either confirm its initial conclusions or provide a revised assessment. |
(3) |
The Selection Board will not reply to any legal arguments, whether related to the contested assessment or not. Any arguments of a legal nature and claims related to the legal framework of the competition may be put forward in the form of an administrative complaint (see Section 7.3.1). |
(4) |
The simple fact that candidates may disagree with the evaluation by the Selection Board of their performance in a test or of their qualifications and/or experience, does not mean that the Selection Board made an error of assessment. The Selection Board enjoys a wide margin of discretion in making value judgements about candidates’ performance, qualifications, and experience. |
(5) |
No request for review is possible in relation to MCQ test results. |
(6) |
To introduce a request for review, a candidate must:
|
(7) |
Candidates will receive an automatic acknowledgment that their request has been received. The Selection Board will examine the request for review and will inform the candidate of its decision as soon as possible. |
(8) |
Requests for review received after the deadline indicated in point (6)(a) above will be considered inadmissible and will not be examined, except where the candidates can prove a situation of force majeure. |
7.3. Other forms of review
7.3.1. Administrative complaints under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations
(1) |
Candidates may lodge an administrative complaint against a measure (a decision or an absence of it) if:
|
(2) |
The complaint can be made against the absence of a decision in those cases where there is an obligation to take a decision within a deadline specified in the Staff Regulations. |
(3) |
Candidates who have submitted a request for review (see Section 7.2.2) must wait until they are notified of the reply to that request before they decide whether to introduce an administrative complaint. In such cases, the deadline for introducing an administrative complaint starts running from the date of notification of the decision of the Selection Board on the request for review. |
(4) |
Administrative complaints are examined by the Director of EPSO acting as the appointing authority under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations. |
(5) |
The purpose of the administrative complaints’ procedure is to verify if the legal framework of the competition has been respected. The candidates should note that the Director of EPSO cannot overturn a value judgement made by a Selection Board and has no legal powers to change the substance of a Selection Board’s decision. If the Director of EPSO finds a procedural mistake or a manifest error of assessment, the case will be referred back to the Selection Board for reassessment. |
(6) |
To introduce an administrative complaint, a candidate should:
|
(7) |
Administrative complaints received after the deadline set in Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations will be considered inadmissible. |
7.3.2. Judicial appeals
(1) |
Candidates have a right to submit a judicial appeal to the General Court, under Article 270 of the Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union and Article 91 of the Staff Regulations. |
(2) |
Judicial appeals against decisions taken by EPSO (rather than by the Selection Board) will not be admissible before the General Court unless a candidate has duly availed themselves of the remedy of an administrative complaint under Article 90(2) of the Staff Regulations (see Section 7.3.1 above). |
(3) |
All the information on judicial appeals can be found on the website of the General Court (13). |
7.3.3. Complaints to the European Ombudsman
(1) |
All EU citizens and residents can make a complaint to the European Ombudsman about instances of maladministration. |
(2) |
Before submitting a complaint to the Ombudsman, candidates must first have exhausted the internal remedies provided by EPSO (see Sections 7.1 and 7.2 above). |
(3) |
Complaints made to the Ombudsman have no suspensive effect on the deadlines laid down for lodging requests, complaints, or judicial appeals referred to in these rules. |
(4) |
All the information on complaints to the Ombudsman can be found on the dedicated website (14). |
End of ANNEX I, click here to return to main text
(1) https://epso.europa.eu/en/contact-us.
(2) https://rm.coe.int/CoERMPublicCommonSearchServices/DisplayDCTMContent?documentId=090000168045bb52.
(3) https://epso.europa.eu/en/contact-us.
(4) https://epso.europa.eu/en/epso-faqs-by-category.
(5) https://epso.europa.eu/en.
(6) https://epso.europa.eu/en/contact-us.
(7) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en.
(8) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/help/faq/complaints.
(9) https://eu-careers.europa.eu/en/help/faq/complaints.
(10) https://epso.europa.eu/en/help/faq/complaints.
(11) https://epso.europa.eu/en/help/faq/complaints.
(12) https://epso.europa.eu/en/help/faq/complaints.
ANNEX II
TYPICAL DUTIES
1. Duties specific to each field
Field 1 – Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics
In this field, the scientific research administrators focus on a wide range of environmental challenges, including climate change, air, water and soil quality monitoring, biodiversity conservation, and sustainable land use. They use advanced measurement and modelling techniques to assess key environmental and climate variables and their interactions with human systems, including economic and social aspects, as well as natural and man-made ecosystems. The goal of their research is to provide valuable insights that inform EU policies and promote sustainability and evidence-based decision-making in Europe. This multidisciplinary approach supports the development and implementation of sustainable environmental practices. The researchers in this field play a crucial role in addressing issues such as industrial pollution, circular economy, and the life cycle of materials and services.
Field 2 – Energy science and sustainability
In this field, the scientific research administrators’ focus spans the supply and transformation of energy sources and associated material supply, renewable energies, energy efficiency, and the integration of sustainable energy systems and sustainable raw material supply, including innovative nuclear energy and its applications. The research emphasises the integration of energy systems and their sustainability, both within the EU and globally.
Field 3 – ICT and (cyber)security
In this field, the scientific research administrators are leading the way in developing innovative technologies and strategies. They are dedicated to protecting critical infrastructure, ensuring the security and dependability of digital systems, and delivering vital services in an increasingly interconnected world. This work goes beyond conventional cybersecurity to focus on building resilience against a wide range of hazards and emerging threats. The researchers analyse new digital technologies and paradigms to evaluate their potential to enhance the resilience of the digital space and identify associated risks. This role helps shape a more secure and resilient digital future.
Field 4 – Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making
In this field, the scientific research administrators focus on analysing large and complex datasets containing structured or unstructured information, geospatial imagery, textual content, numerical data, and categorical information from various sources. This work contributes to evidence-based decision-making in multiple domains by conducting research in data science and applying findings to policy issues. Analysts specialise in modelling, visualising, and interpreting data, which potentially contain noise and anomalies, using econometric modelling, AI, machine learning, and other techniques. The duties involve linking data from different sources and using data science for policy implementation. This work requires application of expertise in multi-dimensional data analysis, including geographical imagery, text, numerical data, and categorical information. Researchers also use Counterfactual Impact Evaluation methods to assess policy impacts and tailor implementations using data science techniques. Jobs in this field offer an opportunity to contribute to impactful projects and policy decision-making.
Field 5 – Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems
In this field, the scientific research administrators develop advanced algorithms and models to tackle complex challenges, including societal implications of AI technologies, natural language processing, autonomous systems, and image recognition. Additionally, the researchers specialising in systems characterised by high complexity, interdependence, and nonlinear dynamics address emerging issues related to climate and financial-economic stability, human interactions with the Earth system, and social responses to crises.
Field 6 – Space applications and geo-information technologies
The work of scientific research administrators in this field involves monitoring environmental and climate changes, enhancing security and disaster management, and improving navigation and communication systems. It also supports European initiatives in space technology and Earth observation, by participating in research and development activities both in the laboratory and in the field.
The role of the researchers includes analysing technology-related value and supply chains, contributing to the work of EU standardisation bodies, and engaging in regulatory discussions in close cooperation with EU Member States. Additionally, the researchers in this field provide support to EU policy actions, including the development of satellite navigation and telecommunication systems to support key EU policies such as the EU Space Programme mission, services, and user segments.
Furthermore, the researchers play a role in implementing the Radio Spectrum Policy Programme for the protection of space frequencies. Geo-data applications drive technological innovation and digitalisation, enabling to monitor policy implementation and assess its impact. These insights provide valuable evidence for the formulation of new policies, including through modelling. Additionally, the researchers’ expertise extends to contributing to the development of power sources, including nuclear, for space missions.
Field 7 – Health and consumer protection
The research in this field covers a wide range of topics such as public health, health technologies, medical devices and in vitro diagnostics, health threats, food/feed safety, sustainability, new genomic techniques-derived products, food fraud and quality, safe and sustainable chemicals, advanced materials, cancer, rare diseases, and the impacts of lifestyle on health. The researchers use modern scientific methods, including bioinformatics and artificial intelligence, to conduct comprehensive research that informs policy makers and regulatory bodies and supports standardisation. The work of the researchers is dedicated to safeguarding the well-being of European citizens and ensuring the appropriate dissemination of information.
Field 8 – Transport science and sustainable mobility
The transport researchers are at the forefront of studying sustainable mobility solutions, transportation infrastructure and the profound impact of emerging technologies on European transportation systems. The researchers contribute significantly to the assessment of technologies, considering environmental and social impacts, safety and security-related aspects. Moreover, they contribute to the standardisation and regulatory processes related to the transport sector.
The work extends beyond technological aspects. The researchers delve into the societal implications of future mobility systems and model the economic aspects and impacts of future transport policies. This includes a comprehensive consideration of how these policies affect climate and environment.
Field 9 – Social, economic, and political sciences
The scientific research administrators working in this field conduct comprehensive analyses across economic, social, and political domains to provide insights for informed decision-making at both European and global levels, with both a short- and long-term perspective. The multidisciplinary approach encompasses the study of economic and financial resilience, societal trends, governance structures, and policy dynamics.
The team of researchers in this field develops rigorous quantitative and qualitative analyses, including foresight, to support EU policymaking in financial, economic, social, territorial, and political spheres. Research transcends disciplinary boundaries to address research questions and promote knowledge co-creation processes involving diverse stakeholders, bridging the realms of science and policymaking. In addition, the researchers contribute to anticipatory governance through foresight and design approaches, assess the societal and economic impact of science, technology, and policymaking, and engage with various stakeholders in transdisciplinary studies of these impacts. They also explore the profound effects of policy on democracy and the polity, and plausible futures of these.
Field 10 – Behavioural science, economics, and education
The scientific research administrators working in this field delve into the complexities of human behaviour, decision-making, and their impact on society. Their research explores a wide range of societal challenges, including issues related to consumption, production, investment, political engagement, education, energy transition, migration, health, training systems, and more.
Through rigorous analytical methods, the researchers in this field also evaluate public policies, anticipate citizen reactions to interventions, and help to optimise policy effectiveness. Such work encompasses micro, macro, financial, market, and sectoral econometric analyses to understand the economy and policy impacts, employing experimental and quasi-experimental methods for policy impact evaluation.
2. Cross-cutting duties
The scientific research administrators may also carry out the following duties, in relation to their respective field:
(a) |
Leading or coordinating a team; and/or |
(b) |
Communicating complex scientific information to a variety of audiences, including communicating scientific findings and technical matters to non-specialists; and/or |
(c) |
Writing for policy makers; and/or |
(d) |
Collaborating with other EU institutions, international organisations, national or regional/local authorities, industrial partners, researchers, stakeholders, and citizens. |
End of ANNEX II, click here to return to main text
ANNEX III
SPECIFIC ELIGIBILITY CONDITIONS — EDUCATION, EXPERIENCE, PUBLICATIONS
1. Conditions common to all fields
To be considered eligible, a candidate in any field covered by this competition must meet the requirements referred to in points (a) and (b) below:
(a) |
Have a level of education which corresponds to completed university studies of at least three years, attested by a diploma in a relevant scientific domain, followed by a minimum of seven years of relevant professional experience. The ‘relevance’ requirements referred to in this point are defined for each field in Section 2 of this Annex. Please note that in accordance with Section 2.2 of the General rules, doctorate studies can be considered as relevant professional experience, provided the doctorate was obtained. The period taken into account will not exceed three years. |
(b) |
Have a scientific publication record consisting of a minimum of two peer-reviewed publications in which they have participated as an author, co-author, or contributor. Candidates will be required to provide references to those publications, which must include the Digital Object Identifier (DOI) and/or ISBN/ISSN codes and must fall within one of ‘All Science Journal Classifications’ (ASJC) listed – in Section 2 of this Annex – as relevant to the field chosen by the candidate. Please note that the ASJC classification system employs a four-digit code to categorise scientific journals. Journals listed between ‘xx01’ and ‘xx99’ are specific subfields within a broader general category identified by codes ending in ‘xx00’. For example, a journal classified under ‘2304 Environmental chemistry’ is also affiliated with the broader category ‘2300 Environmental sciences’. To be eligible, the publication must fall within one of the listed broader ASJC categories. |
2. Conditions specific to each field
2.1. Field 1 – Environmental and climate sciences, engineering, and economics
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 1, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 1, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 1 are:
|
2.2. Field 2 – Energy science and sustainability
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 2, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 2, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 2 are:
|
2.3. Field 3 – ICT and (cyber)security
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 3, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 3, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 3 are:
|
2.4. Field 4 – Data analysis, research, and applications for evidence-based decision-making
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 4, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 4, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 4 are:
|
2.5. Field 5 – Research and applications in artificial intelligence, machine learning, and complex systems
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 5, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 5, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 5 are:
|
2.6. Field 6 – Space applications and geo-information technologies
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 6, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 6, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 6 are:
|
2.7. Field 7 – Health and consumer protection
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 7, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 7, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 7 are:
|
2.8. Field 8 – Transport science and sustainable mobility
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 8, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 8, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 8 are:
|
2.9. Field 9 – Social, economic, and political sciences
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 9, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 9, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 9 are:
|
2.10. Field 10 – Behavioural science, economics, and education
(a) |
To be considered relevant for field 10, the diploma referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following scientific domains:
|
(b) |
To be considered relevant for field 10, the professional experience referred to in point 1(a) of this Annex must be acquired in one or more of the following areas of activity:
|
(c) |
The ASJC categories referred to in point 1(b) of this Annex considered relevant for field 10 are:
|
End of ANNEX III, click here to return to main text
ANNEX IV
EXAMPLES OF MINIMUM QUALIFICATIONS
(Examples of minimum qualifications per Member State and the United Kingdom and per grade corresponding, in principle, to those required by the notices of competition)
Please click here for an easy-to-read version of these examples
|
AST-SC 1 to AST-SC 6 AST 1 to AST 7 |
AST 3 to AST 11 |
AD 5 to AD 16 |
|||||||||||||
COUNTRY |
Secondary education (giving access to post-secondary education) |
Post-secondary education (non-university higher education course or short university course lasting at least 2 years) |
University-level education (lasting at least 3 years) |
University-level education (4 years or more) |
||||||||||||
Belgique — België — Belgien |
Certificat de l’enseignement secondaire supérieur (CESS)/Diploma secundair onderwijs Diplôme d'aptitude à accéder à l'enseignement supérieur (DAES)/Getuigschrift van hoger secundair onderwijs Diplôme d'enseignement professionnel/Getuigschrift van het beroepssecundair onderwijs |
Candidature/Kandidaat Graduat/Gegradueerde Bachelor/Professioneel gerichte Bachelor |
Bachelor académique (180 crédits) Academisch gerichte Bachelor (180 ECTS) |
Licence/Licentiaat Master Diplôme d'études approfondies (DEA) Diplôme d'études spécialisées (DES) Diplôme d'études supérieures spécialisées (DESS) Gediplomeerde in de Voortgezette Studies (GVS) Gediplomeerde in de Gespecialiseerde Studies (GGS) Gediplomeerde in de Aanvullende Studies (GAS) Agrégation/Aggregaat Ingénieur industriel/Industrieel ingenieur Doctorat/Doctoraal diploma |
||||||||||||
България |
Диплома за завършено средно образование |
Специалист по … |
|
Диплома за висше образование Бакалавър Магистър |
||||||||||||
Česko |
Vysvědčení o maturitní zkoušce |
Vysvědčení o absolutoriu (Absolutorium) + diplomovaný specialista (DiS.) |
Diplom o ukončení bakalářského studia (Bakalář) |
Diplom o ukončení vysokoškolského studia Magistr Doktor |
||||||||||||
Danmark |
Bevis for: Studentereksamen Højere Forberedelseseksamen (HF) Højere Handelseksamen (HHX) Højere Afgangseksamen (HA) Bac pro: Bevis for Højere Teknisk Eksamen (HTX) |
Videregående uddannelser = Bevis for = Eksamensbevis som (erhvervsakademiuddannelse AK) |
Bachelorgrad (BA eller BS) Professionsbachelorgrad Diplomingeniør |
Kandidatgrad/Candidatus Master/Magistergrad (mag.art) Licenciatgrad ph.d.-grad |
||||||||||||
Deutschland |
Abitur/Zeugnis der allgemeinen Hochschulreife Fachabitur/Zeugnis der Fachhochschulreife |
|
Fachhochschulabschluss Bachelor |
Hochschulabschluss/Fachhochschulabschluss/Master Magister Artium/Magistra Artium Staatsexamen/Diplom Erstes Juristisches Staatsexamen Doktorgrad |
||||||||||||
Eesti |
Gümnaasiumi lõputunnistus + riigieksamitunnistus Lõputunnistus kutsekeskhariduse omandamise kohta |
Tunnistus keskhariduse baasil kutsekeskhariduse omandamise kohta |
Bakalaureusekraad (min 120 ainepunkti) Bakalaureusekraad (< 160 ainepunkti) |
Rakenduskõrghariduse diplom Bakalaureusekraad (160 ainepunkti) Magistrikraad Arstikraad Hambaarstikraad Loomaarstikraad Filosoofiadoktor Doktorikraad (120–160 ainepunkti) |
||||||||||||
Éire/Ireland |
Ardteistiméireacht, Grád D3, I 5 ábhar/Leaving Certificate Grade D3 in 5 subjects Gairmchlár na hArdteistiméireachta (GCAT)/Leaving Certificate Vocational Programme (LCVP) |
Teastas Náisiúnta/National Certificate Gnáthchéim bhaitsiléara/Ordinary bachelor degree Dioplóma náisiúnta (ND, Dip.)/National diploma (ND, Dip.) Ardteastas (120 ECTS)/Higher Certificate (120 ECTS) |
Céim onóracha bhaitsiléara (3 bliana/180 ECTS) (BA, B.Sc, B.Eng)/Honours bachelor degree (3 years/180 ECTS) (BA, B.Sc, B.Eng) |
Céim onóracha bhaitsiléara (4 bliana/240 ECTS)/Honours bachelor degree (4 years/240 ECTS) Céim ollscoile/University degree Céim mháistir (60-120 ECTS)/Master’s degree (60-120 ECTS) Dochtúireacht/Doctorate |
||||||||||||
Ελλάδα |
Απολυτήριο Γενικού Λυκείου Απολυτήριο Κλασικού Λυκείου Απολυτήριο Τεχνικού Επαγγελματικού Λυκείου Απολυτήριο Ενιαίου Πολυκλαδικού Λυκείου Απολυτήριο Ενιαίου Λυκείου Απολυτήριο Τεχνολογικού Επαγγελματικού Εκπαιδευτηρίου |
Δίπλωμα επαγγελματικής κατάρτισης (IΕΚ) |
|
Πτυχίο ΑΕI (πανεπιστημίου, πολυτεχνείου, ΤΕI) Μεταπτυχιακό Δίπλωμα Ειδίκευσης (2ος κύκλος) Διδακτορικό Δίπλωμα (3ος κύκλος) |
||||||||||||
España |
Bachillerato + Curso de Orientación Universitaria (COU) Bachillerato BUP Diploma de Técnico especialista |
FP grado superior (Técnico superior) |
Diplomado/Ingeniero técnico |
Licenciatura Máster Ingeniero Título de Doctor |
||||||||||||
France |
Baccalauréat Diplôme d'accès aux études universitaires (DAEU) Brevet de technicien |
Diplôme d'études universitaires générales (DEUG) Brevet de technicien supérieur (BTS) Diplôme universitaire de technologie (DUT) Diplôme d'études universitaires scientifiques et techniques (DEUST) |
Licence |
Maîtrise Maîtrise des sciences et techniques (MST), maîtrise des sciences de gestion (MSG), diplôme d'études supérieures techniques (DEST), diplôme de recherche technologique (DRT), diplôme d'études supérieures spécialisées (DESS), diplôme d'études approfondies (DEA), master 1, master 2 professionnel, master 2 recherche Diplôme des grandes écoles Diplôme d'ingénieur Doctorat |
||||||||||||
Hrvatska |
Svjedodžba o državnoj maturi Svjedodžba o završnom ispitu |
Stručni pristupnik/pristupnica |
Baccalaureus/Baccalaurea (sveučilišni prvostupnik/prvostupnica) |
Baccalaureus/Baccalaurea (sveučilišni prvostupnik/prvostupnica) Stručni specijalist Magistar struke Magistar inženjer/magistrica inženjerka (mag. ing) Doktor struke Doktor umjetnosti |
||||||||||||
Italia |
Diploma di maturità (vecchio ordinamento) Perito ragioniere Diploma di superamento dell’esame di Stato conclusivo dei corsi di studio di istruzione secondaria superiore |
Diploma universitario (DU) Certificato di specializzazione tecnica superiore Attestato di competenza (4 semestri) |
Diploma di laurea – L (breve) |
Diploma di laurea (DL) Laurea specialistica (LS) Master di I livello Dottorato di ricerca (DR) |
||||||||||||
Κύπρος |
Απολυτήριο |
Δίπλωμα = Programmes offered by Public/Private Schools of Higher Education (for the latter accreditation is compulsory) Higher Diploma |
|
Πανεπιστημιακό Πτυχίο/Bachelor Master Doctorat |
||||||||||||
Latvija |
Atestāts par vispārējo vidējo izglītību Diploms par profesionālo vidējo izglītību |
Diploms par pirmā līmeņa profesionālo augstāko izglītību |
Bakalaura diploms (min. 120 kredītpunktu) |
Bakalaura diploms (160 kredītpunktu) Profesionālā bakalaura diploms Maģistra diploms Profesionālā maģistra diploms Doktora grāds |
||||||||||||
Lietuva |
Brandos atestatas |
Aukštojo mokslo diplomas Aukštesniojo mokslo diplomas |
Profesinio bakalauro diplomas Aukštojo mokslo diplomas |
Aukštojo mokslo diplomas Bakalauro diplomas Magistro diplomas Daktaro diplomas Meno licenciato diplomas |
||||||||||||
Luxembourg |
Diplôme de fin d’études secondaires et techniques |
BTS Brevet de maîtrise Brevet de technicien supérieur Diplôme de premier cycle universitaire (DPCU) Diplôme universitaire de technologie (DUT) |
Bachelor Diplôme d'ingénieur technicien |
Master Diplôme d'ingénieur industriel DESS en droit européen |
||||||||||||
Magyarország |
Gimnáziumi érettségi bizonyítvány Szakközépiskolai érettségi-képesítő bizonyítvány |
Felsőfokú szakképesítést igazoló bizonyítvány (Higher Vocational Programme) |
Főiskolai oklevél Alapfokozat (Bachelor degree 180 credits) |
Egyetemi oklevél Alapfokozat (Bachelor degree 240 credits) Mesterfokozat (Master degree) (Osztatlan mesterképzés) Doktori fokozat |
||||||||||||
Malta |
Advanced Matriculation or GCE Advanced level in 3 subjects (2 of them grade C or higher) Matriculation certificate (2 subjects at Advanced level and 4 at Intermediate level including Systems of Knowledge with overall grade A-C) + Passes in the Secondary Education Certificate examination at Grade 5 2 A Levels (passes A-C) + a number of subjects at Ordinary level, or equivalent |
MCAST diplomas/certificates Higher National Diploma |
Bachelor’s degree |
Bachelor’s degree Master of Arts Doctorate |
||||||||||||
Nederland |
Diploma VWO Diploma staatsexamen (2 diploma's) Diploma staatsexamen voorbereidend wetenschappelijk onderwijs (Diploma staatsexamen VWO) Diploma staatsexamen hoger algemeen voortgezet onderwijs (Diploma staatsexamen HAVO) |
Kandidaatsexamen Associate degree (AD) |
Bachelor (WO) HBO bachelor degree Baccalaureus of ‘Ingenieur’ |
HBO/WO Master's degree Doctoraal examen/Doctoraat |
||||||||||||
Österreich |
Matura/Reifeprüfung Reife- und Diplomprüfung Berufsreifeprüfung |
Kollegdiplom/Akademiediplom |
Fachhochschuldiplom/Bakkalaureus/Bakkalaurea |
Universitätsdiplom Fachhochschuldiplom Magister/Magistra Master Diplomprüfung, Diplom-Ingenieur Magisterprüfungszeugnis Rigorosenzeugnis Doktortitel |
||||||||||||
Polska |
Świadectwo dojrzałości Świadectwo ukończenia liceum ogólnokształcącego |
Dyplom ukończenia kolegium nauczycielskiego Świadectwo ukończenia szkoły policealnej |
Licencjat/Inżynier |
Magister/Magister inżynier Dyplom doktora |
||||||||||||
Portugal |
Diploma de Ensino Secundário Certificado de Habilitações do Ensino Secundário |
|
Bacharel Licenciado |
Licenciado Mestre Doutorado |
||||||||||||
România |
Diplomă de bacalaureat |
Diplomă de absolvire (colegiu universitar) Învățământ preuniversitar |
Diplomă de licenţă |
Diplomă de licenţă Diplomă de inginer Diplomă de urbanist Diplomă de master Certificat de atestare (studii academice postuniversitare) Diplomă de doctor |
||||||||||||
Slovenija |
Maturitetno spričevalo (spričevalo o poklicni maturi) (spričevalo o zaključnem izpitu) |
Diploma višje strokovne šole |
Diploma o pridobljeni visoki strokovni izobrazbi |
Univerzitetna diploma Magisterij Specializacija Doktorat |
||||||||||||
Slovensko |
Vysvedčenie o maturitnej skúške |
Absolventský diplom |
Diplom o ukončení bakalárskeho štúdia (Bakalár) |
Diplom o ukončení vysokoškolského štúdia Bakalár (Bc.) Magister Magister/Inžinier ArtD. |
||||||||||||
Suomi/Finland |
Ylioppilastutkinto tai peruskoulu + kolmen vuoden ammatillinen koulutus – Studentexamen eller grundskola + treårig yrkesinriktad utbildning Todistus yhdistelmäopinnoista (Betyg över kombinationsstudier) |
Ammatillinen opistoasteen tutkinto – Yrkesexamen på institutnivå |
Kandidaatin tutkinto – Kandidatexamen/Ammattikorkeakoulututkinto – Yrkeshögskoleexamen (min. 120 opintoviikkoa – studieveckor) |
Maisterin tutkinto – Magisterexamen/Ammattikorkeakoulututkinto – Yrkeshögskoleexamen (min. 160 opintoviikkoa – studieveckor) Tohtorin tutkinto (Doktorsexamen) joko 4 vuotta tai 2 vuotta lisensiaatin tutkinnon jälkeen – antingen 4 år eller 2 år efter licentiatexamen Lisensiaatti/Licentiat |
||||||||||||
Sverige |
Slutbetyg från gymnasieskolan (3-årig gymnasial utbildning) |
Högskoleexamen (80 poäng) Högskoleexamen, 2 år, 120 högskolepoäng Yrkeshögskoleexamen/Kvalificerad yrkeshögskoleexamen, 1–3 år |
Kandidatexamen (akademisk examen omfattande minst 120 poäng, varav 60 poäng fördjupade studier i ett ämne + uppsats motsvarande 10 poäng) Meriter på grundnivå: Kandidatexamen, 3 år, 180 högskolepoäng (Bachelor) |
Magisterexamen (akademisk examen omfattande minst 160 poäng, varav 80 poäng fördjupade studier i ett ämne + uppsats motsvarande 20 poäng eller två uppsatser motsvarande 10 poäng vardera)
Meriter på avancerad nivå:
Meriter på forskarnivå:
|
||||||||||||
United Kingdom |
General Certificate of Education Advanced level — 2 passes or equivalent (grades A to E) BTEC National Diploma General National Vocational Qualification (GNVQ), advanced level Advanced Vocational Certificate of Education, A level (VCE A level) |
Higher National Diploma/Certificate (BTEC)/SCOTVEC Diploma of Higher Education (DipHE) National Vocational Qualifications (NVQ) Scottish Vocational Qualifications (SVQ) level 4 |
(Honours) Bachelor degree NB: Master’s degree in Scotland |
Honours Bachelor degree Master’s degree (MA, MB, MEng, MPhil, MSc) Doctorate |
||||||||||||
NOTE: UK diplomas awarded in 2020 (until 31 December 2020) are accepted without an equivalence. UK diplomas awarded as from 1 January 2021 must be accompanied by an equivalence issued by a competent authority of an EU Member State. |
End of ANNEX IV, click here to return to main text
ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2024/6485/oj
ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)