Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62023TN0547

Case T-547/23: Action brought on 5 September 2023 — Redbeet Interactive v EUIPO — Treastone (RAFT)

OJ C, C/2023/347, 30.10.2023, ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/347/oj (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/347/oj

European flag

Official Journal
of the European Union

EN

Series C

C/2023/347

30.10.2023

Action brought on 5 September 2023 — Redbeet Interactive v EUIPO — Treastone (RAFT)

(Case T-547/23)

(C/2023/347)

Language in which the application was lodged: English

Parties

Applicant: Redbeet Interactive AB (Skövde, Sweden) (represented by: K. von Seydlitz-Brandl, lawyer)

Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Treastone Ltd (London, United Kingdom)

Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: Applicant before the General Court

Trade mark at issue: European Union figurative mark RAFT — European Union trade mark No 18 034 606

Procedure before EUIPO: Cancellation proceedings

Contested decision: Decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 28 June 2023 in Case R 1217/2022-4

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

order EUIPO to bear its own costs and to pay those incurred by Redbeet;

—

order Treastone to bear the costs of the proceedings including those incurred by Redbeet, in case Treastone should become an intervening party in this case.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 60(1)(c) in conjunction with Article 8(4) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

—

Potential violation of Article 60(1)(a) in conjunction with Article 8(1)(a) and (b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.

ELI: http://data.europa.eu/eli/C/2023/347/oj

ISSN 1977-091X (electronic edition)

Top