Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.#WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.#Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.#Case T-221/23.

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.
WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.
Case T-221/23.

Judgment of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 13 November 2024.
WS v European Union Intellectual Property Office.
Civil service – Members of the temporary staff – Recruitment – Selection procedure EXT/22/08/AD 6/DTD – Business Analyst – Decision not to admit the applicant to the next stage of the procedure – Action for annulment – Rule of correspondence – Article 91(2) of the Staff Regulations – Admissibility – Manifest error of assessment – Liability.
Case T-221/23.

ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2024:820