This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62019TB0587
Case T-587/19: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Response lodged out of time — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-587/19: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Response lodged out of time — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
Case T-587/19: Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién) (EU trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal — Response lodged out of time — Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure — Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision — No need to adjudicate)
OJ C 163, 3.5.2021, p. 31–31
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
3.5.2021 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 163/31 |
Order of the General Court of 23 February 2021 — Frutas Tono v EUIPO — Agrocazalla (Marién)
(Case T-587/19) (1)
(EU trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Intervention by the other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal - Response lodged out of time - Refusal to grant leave to intervene under Article 173(1) of the Rules of Procedure - Cancellation of the earlier word mark serving as a basis for the contested decision - No need to adjudicate)
(2021/C 163/41)
Language of the case: Spanish
Parties
Applicant: Frutas Tono, SL (Benifairó de la Valldigna, Spain) (represented by: A. Cañizares Doménech, lawyer)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of EUIPO: Agrocazalla, SL (Lorca, Spain)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 25 June 2019 (Case R 171/2018-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Agrocazalla and Frutas Tono.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
Agrocazalla, SL is not granted leave to participate in the proceedings. |
|
2. |
Agrocazalla shall bear its own costs. |
|
3. |
There is no longer any need to adjudicate on the action. |
|
4. |
Each party shall bear its own costs. |