Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62019CN0002

Case C-2/19: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 4 January 2019 — A.P. v Riigiprokuratuur

OJ C 93, 11.3.2019, p. 34–34 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

11.3.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 93/34


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Riigikohus (Estonia) lodged on 4 January 2019 — A.P. v Riigiprokuratuur

(Case C-2/19)

(2019/C 93/44)

Language of the case: Estonian

Referring court

Riigikohus

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: A.P.

Respondent: Riigiprokuratuur

Question referred

Is the recognition and supervision of execution of a judgment of a Member State compatible with Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA (1) of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions even where the sentenced person has by that judgment been conditionally released without any additional obligations being imposed, so that the person’s only obligation is to avoid committing a new intentional offence during the probation period (this being a suspended sentence within the meaning of Paragraph 73 of the Estonian Criminal Code)?


(1)  Council Framework Decision 2008/947/JHA of 27 November 2008 on the application of the principle of mutual recognition to judgments and probation decisions with a view to the supervision of probation measures and alternative sanctions (OJ 2008 L 337, p. 102).


Top