Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0678

Case C-678/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 November 2018 — Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

OJ C 25, 21.1.2019, p. 26–26 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

21.1.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 25/26


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Hoge Raad der Nederlanden (Netherlands) lodged on 5 November 2018 — Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

(Case C-678/18)

(2019/C 25/32)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Procureur-Generaal bij de Hoge Raad der Nederlanden

Question referred

Must Article 90(1) of Regulation No 6/2002 (1) be interpreted as requiring the mandatory granting, to all courts and tribunals of a Member State referred to therein, of jurisdiction to grant provisional and protective measures, or does it leave the Member States — in full or in part — free to delegate jurisdiction to grant such measures exclusively to the courts and tribunals which, in accordance with Article 80(1) of Regulation No 6/2002, have been designated as courts (of first and second instance) for Community design?


(1)  Council Regulation (EC) No 6/2002 of 12 December 2001 on Community designs (OJ 2002 L 3, pp 1-24).


Top