Help Print this page 

Document 62018CN0269

Title and reference
Case C-269/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 19 April 2018 — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, J, S; other parties: C, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 16–17 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
Languages, formats and link to OJ
BG ES CS DA DE ET EL EN FR GA HR IT LV LT HU MT NL PL PT RO SK SL FI SV
HTML html BG html ES html CS html DA html DE html ET html EL html EN html FR html HR html IT html LV html LT html HU html MT html NL html PL html PT html RO html SK html SL html FI html SV
PDF pdf BG pdf ES pdf CS pdf DA pdf DE pdf ET pdf EL pdf EN pdf FR pdf HR pdf IT pdf LV pdf LT pdf HU pdf MT pdf NL pdf PL pdf PT pdf RO pdf SK pdf SL pdf FI pdf SV
Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal Display Official Journal
 To see if this document has been published in an e-OJ with legal value, click on the icon above (For OJs published before 1st July 2013, only the paper version has legal value).
Multilingual display
Text

6.8.2018   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 276/16


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Raad van State (Netherlands) lodged on 19 April 2018 — Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, J, S; other parties: C, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

(Case C-269/18)

(2018/C 276/24)

Language of the case: Dutch

Referring court

Raad van State

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellants: Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie, J, S

Other parties: C, Staatssecretaris van Veiligheid en Justitie

Questions referred

1.

In the case where a determining authority has rejected an application for international protection as being manifestly unfounded within the meaning of Article 46(6)(a) of Directive 2013/32/EU (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 on common procedures for granting and withdrawing international protection (recast) and the appeal brought against that rejection before a court under national law does not have automatic suspensive effect, must Article 46(8) of that directive then be interpreted as meaning that the mere lodging of an application for interim relief results in the applicant’s stay on the territory of the Member State no longer being illegal within the meaning of Article 3 of Directive 2008/115/EC (2) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 16 December 2008 on common standards and procedures in Member States for returning illegally staying third-country nationals and that he therefore comes within the scope of Directive 2013/33/EU (3) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 26 June 2013 laying down standards for the reception of applicants for international protection (recast)?

2.

Is it material to the answer to Question 1 that national law — having regard to the principle of non-refoulement — provides that an applicant will not be removed before a court has, on request, ruled that the outcome of the appeal against the decision refusing international protection cannot be awaited?


(1)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 60.

(2)  OJ 2008 L 348, p. 98.

(3)  OJ 2013 L 180, p. 96.


Top