Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62018CN0265

Case C-265/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 17 April 2018 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė

OJ C 276, 6.8.2018, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

201807200402013442018/C 276/232652018CJC27620180806EN01ENINFO_JUDICIAL20180417161611

Case C-265/18: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 17 April 2018 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė

Top

C2762018EN1610120180417EN0023161161

Request for a preliminary ruling from the Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas (Lithuania) lodged on 17 April 2018 — Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos v Akvilė Jarmuškienė

(Case C-265/18)

2018/C 276/23Language of the case: Lithuanian

Referring court

Lietuvos vyriausiasis administracinis teismas

Parties to the main proceedings

Appellant: Valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Respondent: Akvilė Jarmuškienė

Interested third party: Vilniaus apskrities valstybinė mokesčių inspekcija prie Lietuvos Respublikos finansų ministerijos

Question referred

Must Articles 282 to 292 of Council Directive 2006/112/EC ( 1 ) of 28 November 2006 on the common system of value added tax be interpreted as meaning that in circumstances, such as those in the present case, where two goods are supplied by means of the same transaction but the annual turnover limit (the volume of activity) laid down in Article 287 of Directive 2006/112/EC (and in the corresponding provision of national legislation) is exceeded only on account of the supply of one of those goods, the taxable person (the supplier) is obliged, inter alia, to calculate and pay value added tax (1) on the entire value of the transaction (on the value of the supply of both goods) or (2) only on the part of the transaction whereby the aforesaid limit (volume of activity) is exceeded (on the value of the supply of one of the goods)?


( 1 ) OJ 2006 L 347, p. 1.

Top