Back to EUR-Lex homepage

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search
You are here

Document 62015TN0167

Case T-167/15: Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise v OHIM — Freistaat Bayern (NEUSCHWANSTEIN)

OJ C 178, 1.6.2015, p. 23–24 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

1.6.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 178/23

Action brought on 2 April 2015 — Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise v OHIM — Freistaat Bayern (NEUSCHWANSTEIN)

(Case T-167/15)

(2015/C 178/23)

Language in which the application was lodged: German

Parties

Applicants: Bundesverband Souvenir — Geschenke — Ehrenpreise e.V. (Veitsbronn, Deutschland) (represented by: B. Bittner, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (OHIM)

Other party to the proceedings before the Appeal Board: Freistaat Bayern (Munich, Germany)

Details of the proceedings before OHIM

Proprietor of the trade mark at issue: The other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

Trade mark at issue: Community word mark ‘NEUSCHWANSTEIN’

Procedure before OHIM: Proceedings for a declaration of invalidity

Contested decision: Decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of the OHIM of 22 January 2015 in Case R 28/2014-5

Form of order sought

The applicant claims that the Court should:

—

annul the contested decision;

—

declare the sign ‘NEUSCHWANSTEIN’ — Community trade mark No 10 144 392 — invalid;

—

order OHIM to pay the costs of the proceedings.

Pleas in law

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 7(1)(c) of Regulation No 207/2009;

—

Infringement of Article 52(1)(b) of Regulation No 207/2009.
Top