Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62015CN0547

Case C-547/15: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 October 2015 — Interservice d.o.o. Koper v Sándor Horváth

OJ C 27, 25.1.2016, p. 9–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

25.1.2016   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 27/9


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Kúria (Hungary) lodged on 20 October 2015 — Interservice d.o.o. Koper v Sándor Horváth

(Case C-547/15)

(2016/C 027/11)

Language of the case: Hungarian

Referring court

Kúria

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Interservice d.o.o. Koper

Defendant: Sándor Horváth

Questions referred

1.

Must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 (1) establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that not only the person who enters into a transport agreement with the seller for the transport of the goods (the contractual or main carrier), but also the person who carries out the transport, in full or in part, on the basis of another transport agreement concluded with the contractual or main carrier (the transport subcontractor), is to be regarded as a carrier of the goods?

2.

If the first question is answered in the affirmative, must Article 96(2) of Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 establishing the Community Customs Code be interpreted as meaning that, in a case such as that in the main proceedings, the transport subcontractor is required, before continuing the transport of the goods, to ensure in a satisfactory manner that the main carrier actually produced the goods at the customs office of destination in the manner prescribed?


(1)  Corrigendum to Council Regulation (EEC) No 2913/92 of 12 October 1992 establishing the Community Customs Code (OJ 1992 L 302) (OJ 2014 L 367, p. 126).


Top