Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0549

Case C-549/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 2 December 2014  — Finn Frogne A/S v Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation

OJ C 56, 16.2.2015, p. 8–9 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

16.2.2015   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 56/8


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Højesteret (Denmark) lodged on 2 December 2014 — Finn Frogne A/S v Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation

(Case C-549/14)

(2015/C 056/10)

Language of the case: Danish

Referring court

Højesteret

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Finn Frogne A/S

Defendant: Rigspolitiet ved Center for Beredskabskommunikation

Question referred

Is Article 2 of Directive 2004/18/EC (1) of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts, read in conjunction with the judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union in Pressetext Nachrichtenagentur v Austria, C-454/06, ECR, ECLI:EU:C:2008:351, and Wall v La ville de Francfort-sur-le-Main and Frankfurter Entsorgungs- und Service (FES), C-91/08, ECR, ECLI:EU:C:2010:182, to be interpreted as meaning that a settlement agreement which introduces limitations on and amendments to the services to be provided as originally agreed by the parties under a contract previously put out to tender and also mutual agreement to waive application of remedies for breach in order to avoid a subsequent litigation constitutes a contract which in itself requires a tendering procedure, in a situation where the original contract has become distressed?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.


Top