Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62014CN0406

Case C-406/14: Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 27 August 2014 — Wrocław — Miasto na prawach powiatu v Minister Infrastruktury i Rozwoju

OJ C 431, 1.12.2014, p. 11–12 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

1.12.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 431/11


Request for a preliminary ruling from the Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie (Poland) lodged on 27 August 2014 — Wrocław — Miasto na prawach powiatu v Minister Infrastruktury i Rozwoju

(Case C-406/14)

(2014/C 431/18)

Language of the case: Polish

Referring court

Wojewódzki Sąd Administracyjny w Warszawie

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: Wrocław — Miasto na prawach powiatu

Defendant: Minister Infrastruktury i Rozwoju

Questions referred

1.

In the light of Article 25 of Directive 2004/18/EC
of the European Parliament and of the Council of 31 March 2004 on the coordination of procedures for the award of public works contracts, public supply contracts and public service contracts
 (1) is the contracting authority allowed to stipulate in the tender specifications that the economic operator is required to perform at least 25 % of the works covered by the contract using its own resources?

2.

If the answer to the first question is in the negative, does the application of the requirement described in that question in a procedure for the award of a public contract result in an infringement of provisions of EU law which justifies the necessity to make a financial correction pursuant to Article 98 of Council Regulation (EC) No 1083/2006 of 11 July 2006 laying down general provisions on the European Regional Development Fund, the European Social Fund and the Cohesion Fund and repealing Regulation (EC) No 1260/1999 (2)?


(1)  OJ 2004 L 134, p. 114.

(2)  OJ 2006 L 210, p. 25.


Top