EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62013TA0633
Case T-633/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Reed Exhibitions v OHIM (INFOSECURITY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INFOSECURITY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-633/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Reed Exhibitions v OHIM (INFOSECURITY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INFOSECURITY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
Case T-633/13: Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Reed Exhibitions v OHIM (INFOSECURITY) (Community trade mark — Application for Community word mark INFOSECURITY — Absolute ground for refusal — Descriptive character — No distinctive character — No distinctive character acquired through use — Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 — Obligation to state reasons)
OJ C 389, 23.11.2015, p. 41–41
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
23.11.2015 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 389/41 |
Judgment of the General Court of 23 September 2015 — Reed Exhibitions v OHIM (INFOSECURITY)
(Case T-633/13) (1)
((Community trade mark - Application for Community word mark INFOSECURITY - Absolute ground for refusal - Descriptive character - No distinctive character - No distinctive character acquired through use - Article 7(1)(b) and (c) and Article 7(3) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 - Obligation to state reasons))
(2015/C 389/43)
Language of the case: English
Parties
Applicant: Reed Exhibitions Ltd (Richmond, United Kingdom) (represented by: S. Malynicz, Barrister)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: A. Poch and S. Hanne, acting as Agents)
Re:
Action brought against the decision of the Fifth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 10 September 2013 (Case R 1544/2012-5) concerning an application for registration of the word sign INFOSECURITY as a Community trade mark.
Operative part of the judgment
The Court:
1. |
Dismisses the action; |
2. |
Orders Reed Exhibitions Ltd to pay the costs. |