EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62012TA0348

Case T-348/12: Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014  — Globosat Programadora v OHIM — Sport TV Portugal (SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL) (Community trade mark — Opposition proceedings — Application for Community word mark SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL — Earlier national figurative mark SPORTV — Relative ground for refusal — Proof of use of the earlier mark — Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95)

OJ C 129, 28.4.2014, p. 19–20 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

28.4.2014   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 129/19


Judgment of the General Court of 12 March 2014 — Globosat Programadora v OHIM — Sport TV Portugal (SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL)

(Case T-348/12) (1)

((Community trade mark - Opposition proceedings - Application for Community word mark SPORT TV INTERNACIONAL - Earlier national figurative mark SPORTV - Relative ground for refusal - Proof of use of the earlier mark - Article 42(2) of Regulation (EC) No 207/2009 and Rule 22 of Regulation (EC) No 2868/95))

2014/C 129/24

Language of the case: English

Parties

Applicant: Globosat Programadora Ltda (Rio de Janeiro, Brazil) (represented by: S. Micallef, lawyer)

Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs) (represented by: J. Crespo Carrillo, acting as Agent)

Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal of OHIM, intervener before the General Court: Sport TV Portugal, SA (Lisbon, Portugal) (represented by: B. Braga da Cruz and J. Pimenta, lawyers)

Re:

Action brought against the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of OHIM of 23 May 2012 (case R 2079/2010-4), relating to opposition proceedings between Globosat Programadora Ltda and Sport TV Portugal, SA.

Operative part of the judgment

The Court:

1.

Dismisses the action;

2.

Orders Globosat Programadora Ltda to pay the costs.


(1)  OJ C 311, 13.10.2012.


Top