EUR-Lex Access to European Union law
This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62010FB0088
Case F-88/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 — Van Asbroek v European Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision on classification in intermediate grade — Request for re-examination — Substantial new fact — None — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-88/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 — Van Asbroek v European Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision on classification in intermediate grade — Request for re-examination — Substantial new fact — None — Action manifestly inadmissible)
Case F-88/10: Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 — Van Asbroek v European Commission (Civil service — Officials — Decision on classification in intermediate grade — Request for re-examination — Substantial new fact — None — Action manifestly inadmissible)
OJ C 232, 6.8.2011, p. 42–42
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
6.8.2011 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 232/42 |
Order of the Civil Service Tribunal (First Chamber) of 30 June 2011 — Van Asbroek v European Commission
(Case F-88/10) (1)
(Civil service - Officials - Decision on classification in intermediate grade - Request for re-examination - Substantial new fact - None - Action manifestly inadmissible)
(2011/C 232/76)
Language of the case: French
Parties
Applicant: Van Asbroek (Dilbeek, Belgium) (represented by: S. Rodrigues, A. Blot and C. Bernard-Glanz, lawyers)
Defendant: European Commission (represented by: initially by G. Berscheid and D. Martin, Agents, and subsequently by J. Currall and G. Berscheid, Agents)
Re:
Action for annulment of the decision rejecting the applicant's request for partial annulment of the Commission's decision of 22 October 2008 regarding the introduction of a compensatory allowance in favour of officials who changed category before 1 May 2004, for reclassification, with retroactive effect from 1 May 2004, in grade D*4/8 and for reconstruction of his career to reflect the promotions, annual adjustments and advancements in step to which it had been subject since then.
Operative part of the order
|
1. |
The action is dismissed as manifestly inadmissible. |
|
2. |
Mr Van Asbroek shall bear all the costs. |