Accept Refuse

EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62008CN0111

Case C-111/08: Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta Domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 12 March 2008 — SCT Industri Aktiebolag i likvidation v Alpenblume Aktiebolag

OJ C 116, 9.5.2008, p. 16–16 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

9.5.2008   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 116/16


Reference for a preliminary ruling from the Högsta Domstolen (Sweden) lodged on 12 March 2008 — SCT Industri Aktiebolag i likvidation v Alpenblume Aktiebolag

(Case C-111/08)

(2008/C 116/28)

Language of the case: Swedish

Referring court

Högsta Domstolen

Parties to the main proceedings

Applicant: SCT Industri Aktiebolag i likvidation

Defendant: Alpenblume Aktiebolag

Question referred

Is the exception in the Brussels I Regulation regarding insolvency, compositions and analogous proceedings to be interpreted as meaning that it covers a decision given by a court in one Member State (A) regarding registration of ownership of shares in a company having its registered office in Member State A, which ownership is transferred by the liquidator to a company in another Member State (B), where the court based its decision on the fact that Member State A, in the absence of an agreement between the States regarding mutual recognition of insolvency proceedings, does not recognise the liquidator's powers of disposal over property in Member State A?


Top