EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document E2019P0002

Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 24 January 2019 in the case of D and E (Case E-2/19)

OJ C 197, 13.6.2019, p. 35–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

13.6.2019   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 197/35


Request for an Advisory Opinion from the EFTA Court by Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein dated 24 January 2019 in the case of D and E

(Case E-2/19)

(2019/C 197/07)

A request has been made to the EFTA Court by a letter of 24 January 2019 from Verwaltungsgerichtshof des Fürstentums Liechtenstein (the Administrative Court of the Principality of Liechtenstein), which was received at the Court Registry on 29 January 2019, for an Advisory Opinion in the case of D and E, on the following question:

Must Directive 2004/38, in particular Article 3(1) in conjunction with Article 7(1)(d) thereof, and the first sentence of Point III of [EEA Joint Committee] Decision No 191/1999 be interpreted as meaning that a family member of a national of an EU Member State has the right to obtain a permit of the same validity as that of the person on whom he depends even if the person on whom he depends obtained the right of residence in Liechtenstein only on the basis of national law and not on the basis of EEA law?


Top