This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document C2006/178/64
Case T-147/06: Action brought on 19 May 2006 — En Route International Limited v OHIM
Case T-147/06: Action brought on 19 May 2006 — En Route International Limited v OHIM
Case T-147/06: Action brought on 19 May 2006 — En Route International Limited v OHIM
OJ C 178, 29.7.2006, p. 35–35
(ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, IT, LV, LT, HU, NL, PL, PT, SK, SL, FI, SV)
|
29.7.2006 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 178/35 |
Action brought on 19 May 2006 — En Route International Limited v OHIM
(Case T-147/06)
(2006/C 178/64)
Language of the case: German
Parties
Applicant: En Route International Limited (Berkshire, United Kingdom) (represented by: W. W. Göpfert, lawyer)
Defendant: Office for Harmonisation in the Internal Market (Trade Marks and Designs)
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the decision of the Fourth Board of Appeal of 7 March 2006 in Case R 352/2005-4; |
|
— |
order the defendant to pay the costs. |
Pleas in law and main arguments
Community trade mark concerned: The word mark 'FRESHHH' for goods in Classes 29, 30 and 32 (Application No 3 198 165).
Decision of the Examiner: Rejection of the application.
Decision of the Board of Appeal: Dismissal of the appeal.
Pleas in law: The mark applied for is registrable; no grounds for refusal under Article 7(1)(b) and (c) or Article 7(2) of Regulation (EC) No 40/94 (1) stand in the way of its registration.
(1) Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark (OJ L 11, 1994, p. 1).