Access to European Union law
<a href="https://eur-lex.europa.eu/content/help/eurlex-content/experimental-features.html" target="_blank">More about the experimental features corner</a>
Choose the experimental features you want to try
EUR-Lex
Access to European Union law

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

You are here
Use quotation marks to search for an "exact phrase". Append an asterisk (*) to a search term to find variations of it (transp*, 32019R*). Use a question mark (?) instead of a single character in your search term to find variations of it (ca?e finds case, cane, care).
Search tips
Need more search options? Use the Advanced search

Document 62022TN0604

    Case T-604/22: Action brought on 27 September 2022 — Société du Tour de France v EUIPO — FitX (TOUR DE X)

    OJ C 432, 14.11.2022, p. 34–35 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, GA, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)

    14.11.2022   

    EN

    Official Journal of the European Union

    C 432/34

    Action brought on 27 September 2022 — Société du Tour de France v EUIPO — FitX (TOUR DE X)

    (Case T-604/22)

    (2022/C 432/42)

    Language in which the application was lodged: English

    Parties

    Applicant: Société du Tour de France (Boulogne-Billancourt, France) (represented by: T. de Haan and S. Vandezande, lawyers)

    Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)

    Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: FitX Beteiligungs GmbH (Essen, Germany)

    Details of the proceedings before EUIPO

    Applicant of the trade mark at issue: Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal

    Trade mark at issue: Application for European Union figurative mark TOUR DE X — Application for registration No 16 701 039

    Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings

    Contested decision: Decision of the Second Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 11 July 2022 in Case R 1136/2019-2

    Form of order sought

    The applicant claims that the Court should:

    —

    set aside the contested decision;

    —

    order EUIPO and the intervener to bear the costs, including those incurred by the applicant before the Office’s Second Board of Appeal.

    Pleas in law

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 8(5) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council;

    —

    Infringement of Article 94 of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council.
    Top