EUR-Lex Access to European Union law

Back to EUR-Lex homepage

This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website

Document 62022TN0260

Case T-260/22: Action brought on 12 May 2022 — Freixas Montpelt and Others v Committee of the Regions

OJ C 244, 27.6.2022, p. 47–47 (BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 244, 27.6.2022, p. 46–46 (GA)

27.6.2022   

EN

Official Journal of the European Union

C 244/47


Action brought on 12 May 2022 — Freixas Montpelt and Others v Committee of the Regions

(Case T-260/22)

(2022/C 244/63)

Language of the case: French

Parties

Applicants: David Freixas Montpelt (Berchem-Sainte-Agathe, Belgium), Gustavo Lopez Cutillas (Woluwé Saint Pierre, Belgium), Valeria Schirru (Brussels, Belgium), Svetlozar Andreev (Brussels) (represented by: L. Levi and P. Baudoux, lawyers)

Defendant: Committee of the Regions

Form of order sought

The applicants claim that the General Court should:

declare the present action admissible and well founded;

accordingly, annul the list of officials eligible for promotion in the 2021 promotion exercise, in so far as that list does not include the names of Mr Freixas Montpelt at grade AST5, Mr Lopez Cutillas at grade AD6, Ms Schirru at grade SC2 and Mr Andreev Svetlozar at grade AD10;

in so far as necessary, annul the defendant’s decision of 11 February 2022 rejecting the applicants’ complaints;

order the defendant to pay the costs in their entirety.

Pleas in law and main arguments

In support of the action, the applicants rely on two pleas in law.

1.

First plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes Article 45(1) of the Staff Regulations of Officials of the European Union.

2.

Second plea in law, alleging that the decision of 16 June 2021 is unlawful in that it infringes the principle of non-discrimination.


Top