This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62022TN0109
Case T-109/22: Action brought on 28 February 2022 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (frutania)
Case T-109/22: Action brought on 28 February 2022 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (frutania)
Case T-109/22: Action brought on 28 February 2022 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (frutania)
OJ C 158, 11.4.2022, p. 13–13
(BG, ES, CS, DA, DE, ET, EL, EN, FR, HR, IT, LV, LT, HU, MT, NL, PL, PT, RO, SK, SL, FI, SV)
OJ C 158, 11.4.2022, p. 10–11
(GA)
|
11.4.2022 |
EN |
Official Journal of the European Union |
C 158/13 |
Action brought on 28 February 2022 — Schneider v EUIPO — Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas (frutania)
(Case T-109/22)
(2022/C 158/16)
Language in which the application was lodged: German
Parties
Applicant: Markus Schneider (Bonn, Germany) (represented by: M. Bergermann and D. Graetsch, lawyers)
Defendant: European Union Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO)
Other party to the proceedings before the Board of Appeal: Frutaria Comercial de Frutas y Hortalizas, SL (Zaragoza, Spain)
Details of the proceedings before EUIPO
Applicant for the trade mark at issue: Applicant
Trade mark at issue: Application for EU figurative mark frutania in blue — Application for registration No 11 987 419
Procedure before EUIPO: Opposition proceedings
Contested decision: Decision of the First Board of Appeal of EUIPO of 17 December 2021 in Case R 1058/2017-1
Form of order sought
The applicant claims that the Court should:
|
— |
annul the contested decision; |
|
— |
order EUIPO to pay the costs, including those incurred in the appeal proceedings. |
Plea in law
|
— |
incorrect application and interpretation of Article 8(1)(b) of Regulation (EU) 2017/1001 of the European Parliament and of the Council. |