This document is an excerpt from the EUR-Lex website
Document 62021TO0778
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2023.#Rommert Folkertsma v European Commission.#Action for damages – Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) – Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert – Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.#Case T-778/21.
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2023.
Rommert Folkertsma v European Commission.
Action for damages – Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) – Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert – Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-778/21.
Order of the General Court (Tenth Chamber) of 9 February 2023.
Rommert Folkertsma v European Commission.
Action for damages – Contract for technical assistance for support to Bangsamoro transition (Subatra) – Commission’s request to have the applicant replaced as expert – Termination of the contract between the successful tenderer and the applicant – Non-contractual liability – Sufficiently serious breach of a rule of law intended to confer rights on individuals – Causal link – Action manifestly lacking any foundation in law.
Case T-778/21.
ECLI identifier: ECLI:EU:T:2023:58